Hybrid sweet corn plant named COACHMAN

ABSTRACT

A novel hybrid sweet corn plant, designated COACHMAN is disclosed. The disclosure relates to the seeds of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, to the plants and plant parts of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, and to methods for producing a sweet corn plant by crossing the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN with itself or another sweet corn plant.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the field of agriculture, to new anddistinctive hybrid sweet corn plants, such as a hybrid plant designatedCOACHMAN and to methods of making and using such hybrids.

BACKGROUND

The following description includes information that may be useful inunderstanding the present disclosure. It is not an admission that any ofthe information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presentdisclosure, or that any publication specifically or implicitlyreferenced is prior art.

Sweet corn is an important and valuable vegetable crop. Thus, acontinuing goal of plant breeders is to develop stable, high yieldingsweet corn hybrids that are agronomically sound or unique. The reasonsfor this goal are to maximize the amount of ears or kernels produced onthe land used (yield) as well as to improve plant traits, shape and sizeof ears/kernels/husks, eating and processing qualities and/or plantagronomic and horticultural qualities. To accomplish this goal, thesweet corn breeder must select and develop sweet corn plants that havethe traits that result in superior parental lines that combine toproduce superior hybrids.

SUMMARY DISCLOSURE

The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described inconjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to beexemplary, not limiting in scope.

In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems havebeen reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed toother improvements.

According to the disclosure, in some embodiments there is provided anovel hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, also interchangeablyreferred to as ‘hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN’, ‘sweet corn hybridCOACHMAN’ or ‘COACHMAN’.

This disclosure thus relates to the seeds of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, to the plants or parts of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, to plants or parts thereof comprising all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN or parts thereof, and/or having all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, and/or having one or more of or all of thecharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN including butnot limited to as determined at the 5% significance level when grown inthe same environmental conditions, and/or having one or more of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN including but not limited to as determined at the 5%significance level when grown in the same environmental conditionsand/or having all of the physiological and morphological characteristicsof hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN including but not limited to asdetermined at the 5% significance level when grown in the sameenvironmental conditions and/or having one or more of the physiologicaland morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN when grown in the same environmental conditions and/or havingall of the physiological and morphological characteristics of hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN when grown in the same environmentalconditions. The disclosure also relates to variants, mutants and trivialmodifications of the seed or plant of hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No. 44223. In some embodiments, arepresentative sample of seed of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANis deposited under NCIMB No. 44223.

Plant parts of the hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN of thepresent disclosure are also provided, such as, but not limited to, ascion, a rootstock, an ear, a kernel, a leaf, a flower, a peduncle, astalk, a root, a stamen, an anther, a pistil, a pollen or an ovuleobtained from the hybrid plant. The present disclosure provides ears andkernels of the hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN of thepresent disclosure. Such ears, kernels and parts thereof could be usedas fresh products for consumption or in processes resulting in processedproducts such as food products comprising one or more harvested parts ofthe hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, such as prepared kernels orparts thereof, canned kernels or parts thereof, freeze-dried or frozenkernels or parts thereof, diced kernels, juices, prepared kernels,canned sweet corn kernels, pastes, sauces, powders, purees and the like.All such products are part of the present disclosure and the like. Theharvested parts or food products can be or can comprise hybrid sweetcorn fruit from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. The food productsmight have undergone one or more processing steps such as, but notlimited to cutting, washing, mixing, frizzing, canning, etc. All suchproducts are part of the present disclosure. The present disclosure alsoprovides plant parts or cells of the hybrid sweet corn plant designatedCOACHMAN, wherein a plant regenerated from said plants parts or cellshas one or more of, or all of the phenotypic and morphologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, such as one ormore of or all of the characteristics of hybrid sweet corn plantdesignated COACHMAN, deposited under NCIMB No. 44223. All such parts andcells of the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN are part of the presentdisclosure.

The plants and seeds of the present disclosure include those that may beof an essentially derived variety as defined in section 41(3) of thePlant Variety Protection Act of The United States of America, e.g., avariety that is predominantly derived from hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN or from a variety that i) is predominantly derived from hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN, while retaining the expression of theessential characteristics that result from the genotype or combinationof genotypes of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN; ii) is clearlydistinguishable from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN; and iii)except for differences that result from the act of derivation, conformsto the initial variety in the expression of the essentialcharacteristics that result from the genotype or combination ofgenotypes of the hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN.

In another aspect, the present disclosure provides regenerable cells. Insome embodiments, the regenerable cells are for use in tissue culture ofhybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. In some embodiments, the tissueculture is capable of regenerating plants comprising all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, and/or having all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN,and/or having one or more of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, and/or havingthe characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. In someembodiments, the regenerated plants have the characteristics of hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN including but not limited to asdetermined at the 5% significance level when grown in the sameenvironmental conditions and/or have all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANincluding but not limited to as determined at the 5% significance levelwhen grown in the same environmental conditions and/or have one or moreof the physiological and morphological characteristics hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN including but not limited to as determined at the 5%significance level when grown in the same environmental conditionsand/or have all of the physiological and morphological characteristicsof hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN when grown in the sameenvironmental conditions. 1111 In some embodiments, the plant parts andcells used to produce such tissue cultures will be embryos, meristematiccells, seeds, callus, pollens, leaves, anthers, pistils, stamens, roots,root tips, stems, petioles, kernels, cotyledons, hypocotyls, ovaries,seed coats, kernels, stalks, endosperms, flowers, axillary buds or thelike. Protoplasts produced from such tissue culture are also included inthe present disclosure. The sweet corn leaves, shoots, roots and wholeplants regenerated from the tissue culture, as well as the kernelsproduced by said regenerated plants are also part of the disclosure. Insome embodiments, the whole plants regenerated from the tissue culturehave one, more than one, or all the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of sweet corn hybrid designated COACHMAN, including butnot limited to as determined at the 5% significance level when grown inthe same environmental conditions.

The disclosure also discloses methods for vegetatively propagating aplant of the present disclosure. In the present application,vegetatively propagating can be interchangeably used with vegetativereproduction. In some embodiments, the methods comprise collecting partsof a hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN and regenerating a plant fromsaid parts. In some embodiments, one of the parts can be for example astem. In some embodiments, the methods can be for example a stem cuttingthat is rooted into an appropriate medium according to techniques knownby the one skilled in the art. Plants and parts thereof, including butnot limited to ears and kernels thereof, produced by such methods arealso included in the present disclosure. In another aspect, the plantsand parts thereof, such as ears and kernels thereof, produced by suchmethods comprise all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, and/or haveall of the physiological and morphological characteristics of hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN and/or have the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANand/or have one or more of the characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN. In some embodiments, plants, parts, ears or kernelsthereof produced by such methods consist of one, more than one, or allof the physiological and morphological characteristics of sweet cornhybrid designated COACHMAN, including but not limited to as determinedat the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmentalconditions.

Further included in the disclosure are methods for producing ears andkernels and/or seeds from the hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. Insome embodiments, the methods comprise growing a hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN to produce sweet corn kernels and/or seeds. In someembodiments, the methods further comprise harvesting the hybrid sweetcorn ears, kernels and/or seeds. Such ears, kernels and/or seeds areparts of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, such ears, kernelsand/or seeds have all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of ears, kernels and/or seeds of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN (e.g. those listed in Table 1 and/or deposited underNCIMB No. 44223) when grown in the same environmental conditions and/orhave one or more of the physiological and morphological characteristicsof the ears, kernels and/or seeds of the hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN (e.g. those listed in Table 1 and/or deposited under NCIMB No.44223) when grown in the same environmental conditions and/or have thecharacteristics of the ears, kernels and/or seeds of the hybrid sweetcorn designated COACHMAN (e.g. those listed in Table 1 and/or depositedunder NCIMB No. 44223) when grown in the same environmental conditions.

Also included in this disclosure are methods for producing a sweet cornplant. In some embodiments, the sweet corn plant is produced by crossingthe hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN with itself or other sweetcorn plant. In some embodiments, the other plant can be a hybrid sweetcorn other than the hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. In otherembodiments, the other plant can be a sweet corn inbred line. Whencrossed with an inbred line, in some embodiments, a “three-way cross” isproduced. When crossed with itself (i.e. when a sweet corn COACHMAN iscrossed with another hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN plant or whenself-pollinated), or with another, different hybrid sweet corn, in someembodiments, a “four-way” cross is produced. Such three and four-wayhybrid seeds and plants produced by growing said three and four-wayhybrid seeds are included in the present disclosure. Methods forproducing a three and four-way hybrid sweet corn seeds comprising (a)crossing hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN sweet corn plant with adifferent sweet corn inbred line or hybrid and (b) harvesting theresultant hybrid sweet corn seed are also part of the disclosure. Thehybrid sweet corn seeds produced by the method comprising crossinghybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN sweet corn plant with a differentsweet corn plant such as a sweet corn inbred line or hybrid, andharvesting the resultant hybrid sweet corn seed are included in thedisclosure, as are included the hybrid sweet corn plant or parts thereofand ears, kernels, and/or seeds produced by said grown hybrid sweet cornplants.

Further included in the disclosure are methods for producing sweet cornseeds and plants made thereof. In some embodiments, the methods compriseself-pollinating the hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN andharvesting the resultant hybrid seeds. Sweet corn seeds produced by suchmethod are also part of the disclosure.

In another embodiment, this disclosure relates to methods for producinga hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN from a collection of seeds.

In some embodiments, the collection contains both seeds of inbred parentline(s) of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN seeds and hybrid seedsof COACHMAN. Such a collection of seeds might be a commercial bag ofseeds. In some embodiments, said methods comprise planting thecollection of seeds. When planted, the collection of seeds will produceinbred parent lines of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN and hybrid plants fromthe hybrid seeds of COACHMAN. In some embodiments, said inbred parentlines of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN plants are identified ashaving a decreased vigor compared to the other plants (i.e. hybridplants) grown from the collection of seeds. In some embodiments, saiddecreased vigor is due to the inbreeding depression effect and can beidentified for example by a less vigorous appearance for vegetativeand/or reproductive characteristics including a shorter plant height,smaller ear size, ear and kernel shape, kernel color or othercharacteristics. In some embodiments, seeds of the inbred parent linesof the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN are collected and, if new inbredparent plants thereof are grown and crossed in a controlled manner witheach other, the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN will be recreated.

This disclosure also relates to methods for producing other sweet cornplants derived from hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN and to the sweet cornplants derived by the use of methods described herein.

In some embodiments, such methods for producing a sweet corn plantderived from hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN comprise (a) self-pollinatingthe hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN plant at least once to produce a progenyplant derived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments,the methods further comprise (b) crossing the progeny plant derived fromthe hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN with itself or a second sweet corn plantto produce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation. In someembodiments, the methods further comprise (c) growing the progeny plantof the subsequent generation. In some embodiments, the methods furthercomprise (d) crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generationwith itself or a second sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plantfurther derived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In furtherembodiments, steps (b), step (c) and/or step (d) are repeated for atleast 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or more generations to produce a sweetcorn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In someembodiments, within each crossing cycle, the second plant is the sameplant as the second plant in the last crossing cycle. In someembodiments, within each crossing cycle, the second plant is differentfrom the second plant in the last crossing cycle.

In some embodiments, provided herewith is a method of producing a sweetcorn plant obtained from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN,comprising: (a) self-pollinating the sweet corn plant of the presentdisclosure at least once to produce a progeny sweet corn plant obtainedfrom hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. The method further comprisesthe steps of: (b) crossing the progeny sweet corn plant obtained fromthe hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN with itself or a second sweetcorn plant to produce a progeny seed of a subsequent generation; (c)growing a progeny plant from the progeny seed of the subsequentgeneration; (d) crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generationwith itself or a second sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plantderived from the hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN; and (e)repeating step (c) and/or (d) for at least one generation to produce asweet corn plant further derived from the hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN.

Another method for producing a sweet corn plant derived from hybridsweet corn COACHMAN, comprises (a) crossing the hybrid sweet cornCOACHMAN plant with a second sweet corn plant to produce a progeny plantderived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments, themethod further comprises (b) crossing the progeny plant derived from thehybrid sweet corn COACHMAN with itself or a second sweet corn plant toproduce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation. In someembodiments, the method further comprises (c) growing the progeny plantof the subsequent generation. In some embodiments, the method furthercomprises (d) crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generationwith itself or a second sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plantderived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In a further embodiment,steps (b), (c) and/or (d) are repeated for at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, or more generations to produce a sweet corn plant derived from thehybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments, within each crossingcycle, the second plant is the same plant as the second plant in thelast crossing cycle. In some embodiments, within each crossing cycle,the second plant is different from the second plant in the last crossingcycle.

In some embodiments, provided herewith is a method of producing a sweetcorn plant obtained from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN,comprising: (a) crossing the sweet corn plant of the present disclosurewith a second sweet corn plant to produce a progeny sweet corn plantobtained from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. The method furthercomprises the steps of: (b) crossing the progeny sweet corn plantobtained from the hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN withitself or a second sweet corn plant to produce a progeny seed of asubsequent generation; (c) growing a progeny plant from the progeny seedof the subsequent generation; (d) crossing the progeny plant of thesubsequent generation with itself or a second sweet corn plant toproduce a sweet corn plant derived from the sweet corn hybrid sweet cornplant designated COACHMAN; and (e) repeating step (c) and/or (d) for atleast one generation to produce a sweet corn plant further derived fromthe hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN.

More specifically, the disclosure comprises methods for producing a malesterile sweet corn plant, an herbicide resistant sweet corn plant, aninsect resistant sweet corn plant, a disease resistant sweet corn plant,a water-stress-tolerant plant, a heat stress tolerant plants, animproved shelf life sweet corn plant, a sweet corn plant with increasedsweetness and flavor, a sweet corn plant with increased sugar content, asweet corn plant with enhanced nutritional quality, a sweet corn plantwith improved nutritional use efficiency, a sweet corn plant withdelayed senescence or controlled ripening and/or plants with improvedsalt tolerance. In some embodiments, said methods comprise transformingthe hybrid designated COACHMAN sweet corn plant with nucleic acidmolecules that confer male sterility, herbicide resistance, insectresistance, disease resistance, water-stress tolerance, heat stresstolerance, increased shelf life, increased sweetness and flavor,enhanced nutritional quality, improved nutritional use efficiency,increased sugar content, delayed senescence or controlled ripeningand/or improved salt tolerance, respectively. The transformed sweet cornplants or parts thereof, obtained from the provided methods, includingfor example a male sterile sweet corn plant, an herbicide resistantsweet corn plant, an insect resistant sweet corn plant, a diseaseresistant sweet corn plant, a sweet corn with water stress tolerance, asweet corn plant with heat stress tolerance, a sweet corn plant withincreased sweetness and flavor, a sweet corn plant with increased sugarcontent, a sweet corn with enhanced nutritional quality, a sweet cornplant with improved nutritional use efficiency, a sweet corn plant withdelayed senescence or controlled ripening or a sweet corn plant withimproved salt tolerance are included in the present disclosure. Plantsmay display one or more of the above listed traits. For the presentdisclosure and the skilled artisan, disease is understood to include,but not limited to fungal diseases, viral diseases, bacterial diseases,mycoplasma diseases, or other plant pathogenic diseases and a diseaseresistant plant will encompass a plant resistant to fungal, viral,bacterial, mycoplasma, and other plant pathogens.

In one aspect, the present disclosure provides methods of introducing asingle locus conversion conferring one or more desired trait(s) into thehybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, and plants, ears and/or seeds obtained fromsuch methods. In another aspect, the present disclosure provides methodsof modifying a single locus conversion conferring one or more desiredtrait(s) into the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, and plants, ears and/orseeds obtained from such methods. The desired trait(s) may be, but notexclusively, conferred by a locus that contains a single gene and/ormultiple genes. In some embodiments, the gene is a dominant allele. Insome embodiments, the gene is a partially dominant allele. In someembodiments, the gene is a recessive allele. In some embodiments, thegene or genes will confer or modify such traits, including but notlimited to male sterility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance,resistance for bacterial, fungal, mycoplasma or viral disease, enhancedplant quality such as improved drought or salt tolerance, water-stresstolerance, improved standability, enhanced plant vigor, improved shelflife, delayed senescence or controlled ripening, enhanced nutritionalquality such as increased sugar content or increased sweetness,increased texture, improved flavor and aroma, improved ear length and/orsize, protection for color, ear shape, kernel shape, uniformity, lengthor diameter, kernel color, refinement or depth, lodging resistance,improved yield and recovery, improved fresh cut application, specificaromatic compounds, specific volatiles, flesh texture and specificnutritional components. For the present disclosure and the skilledartisan, disease is understood to include, but not limited to fungaldiseases, viral diseases, bacterial diseases, mycoplasma diseases, orother plant pathogenic diseases and a disease resistant plant willencompass a plant resistant to fungal, viral, bacterial, mycoplasma, andother plant pathogens. In one aspect, the gene or genes may be naturallyoccurring sweet corn gene(s) and/or spontaneous or induced mutations(s).In another aspect, genes are mutated, modified, genetically engineeredthrough the use of New Breeding Techniques described herein. In someembodiments, the method for introducing the desired trait(s) is abackcrossing process by making use of a series of backcrosses to atleast one of the parent lines of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN(a.k.a. hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN or sweet corn hybrid COACHMAN) duringwhich the desired trait(s) is maintained by selection. At least one ofthe parent lines of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN possesses thedesired trait(s) by the backcrossing process, and the desired trait(s)is inherited by the hybrid sweet corn progeny plants by conventionalbreeding techniques known to breeders of ordinary skill in the art. Thesingle gene converted plants or single locus converted plants that canbe obtained by the methods are included in the present disclosure.

When dealing with a gene that has been modified, for example through NewBreeding Techniques, the trait (genetic modification) could be directlymodified into the newly developed hybrid sweet corn plant and/or atleast one of the parent lines of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN.Alternatively, if the trait is not modified into each newly developedhybrid sweet corn plant and/or at least one of the parent lines ofhybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, another typical method used by breeders ofordinary skill in the art to incorporate the modified gene is to take aline already carrying the modified gene and to use such line as a donorline to transfer the modified gene into the newly developed hybrid sweetcorn plant and/or at least one of the parent lines of the newlydeveloped hybrid. The same would apply for a naturally occurring traitor one arising from spontaneous or induced mutations.

In some embodiments, the backcross breeding process of the parentalinbred line plants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN comprises (a) crossingone of the parental inbred line plants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMANwith plants of another line that comprise the desired trait(s) toproduce F1 progeny plants. In some embodiments, the process furthercomprises (b) selecting the F1 progeny plants that have the desiredtrait(s). In some embodiments, the process further comprises (c)crossing the selected F1 progeny plants with the parental inbred sweetcorn lines of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN plants to produce backcrossprogeny plants. In some embodiments, the process further comprises (d)selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the desired trait(s)and essentially all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of the sweet corn parental inbred line of hybrid sweetcorn COACHMAN to produce selected backcross progeny plants. In someembodiments, the process further comprises (e) repeating steps (c) and(d) one, two, three, four, five six, seven, eight, nine or more times insuccession to produce selected, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth,seventh, eighth, ninth or higher backcross progeny plants that have thedesired trait(s) and essentially all of the characteristics of theparental inbred sweet corn line of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, and/orhave the desired trait(s) and essentially all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of the parental sweet corn inbred line ofhybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, and/or have the desired trait(s) andotherwise essentially all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of the parental inbred sweet corn line of sweet cornhybrid COACHMAN, including but not limited to at a 5% significance levelwhen grown in the same environmental conditions. In some embodiments,this method further comprises crossing the backcross progeny plant ofthe parental sweet corn inbred line plant of the hybrid sweet cornCOACHMAN having the desired trait(s) with the second parental inbredsweet corn line plants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN in order to producethe hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN comprising the desired trait(s). Thesweet corn plants or seed produced by the methods are also part of thedisclosure, as are the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN plants that comprisethe desired trait. Backcrossing breeding methods, well known to oneskilled in the art of plant breeding will be further developed insubsequent parts of the specification.

An embodiment of this disclosure is a method of making a backcrossconversion of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments, themethod comprises crossing one of the parental sweet corn inbred lineplants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN with a donor plant comprising aspontaneous or induced mutation(s), a naturally occurring gene(s), or agene(s) and/or sequence(s) modified through New Breeding Techniquesconferring one or more desired traits to produce F1 progeny plants. Insome embodiments, the method further comprises selecting an F1 progenyplant comprising the naturally occurring gene(s), spontaneous or inducedmutation(s) or gene(s) and/or sequences(s) modified through New BreedingTechniques conferring the one or more desired traits. In someembodiments, the method further comprises backcrossing the selectedprogeny plant to the parental sweet corn inbred line plants of hybridsweet corn COACHMAN. This method may further comprise the step ofobtaining a molecular marker profile of the parental sweet corn inbredline plants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN and using the molecular markerprofile to select for the progeny plant with the desired trait and themolecular marker profile of the parental sweet corn inbred line plantsof hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments, this method furthercomprises crossing the backcross progeny plant COACHMAN of the parentalsweet corn inbred line plant of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN containingthe naturally occurring gene(s), the spontaneous or induced mutation(s),or the gene(s) and/or sequences modified through New Breeding Techniquesconferring the one or more desired trait with the second parental inbredsweet corn line plants of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN in order to producethe hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN comprising the naturally occurringgene(s), the spontaneous or induced mutation(s) or gene(s), and/orsequences modified through New Breeding Techniques conferring the one ormore desired traits. The plants or parts thereof produced by suchmethods are also part of the present disclosure.

In some embodiments of the disclosure, the number of loci that may betransferred and/or backcrossed into the parental sweet corn inbred lineof hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN is at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more.

A single locus may contain several genes. A single locus conversion alsoallows for making one or more site specific changes to the plant genome,such as, without limitation, one or more nucleotide changes, deletions,insertions, substitutions, etc. In some embodiments, the single locusconversion is performed by genome editing, a.k.a. genome editing withengineered nucleases (GEEN). In some embodiments, the genome editingcomprises using one or more engineered nucleases. In some embodiments,the engineered nucleases include, but are not limited to Zinc fingernucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases(TALENs), the CRISPR/Cas system (using such as Cas9, Cas12a/Cpf1,Cas13/C2c2, CasX and CasY), RNA-guided nucleases, meganuclease, homingendonucleases and endonucleases for DNA guided genome editing (Gao etal., Nature Biotechnology (2016), doi: 10.1038/nbt.3547). In someembodiments, the single locus conversion changes one or severalnucleotides of the plant genome. Such genome editing techniques are someof the techniques now known by the person skilled in the art and hereinare collectively referred to as “New Breeding Techniques”. In someembodiments, one or more above-mentioned genome editing methods aredirectly applied on a plant of the present disclosure, rather than onthe parental sweet corn inbred lines of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN.Accordingly, a cell containing edited genome, or a plant part containingsuch cell can be isolated and used to regenerate a novel plant which hasa new trait conferred by said genome editing, and essentially all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet cornplant COACHMAN.

The disclosure further provides methods for developing sweet corn plantsin a sweet corn plant breeding program using plant breeding techniquesincluding but not limited to, recurrent selection, backcrossing,pedigree breeding, genomic selection, molecular marker (IsozymeElectrophoresis, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs),Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), Arbitrarily PrimedPolymerase Chain Reactions (AP-PCRs), DNA Amplification Fingerprintings(DAFs), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), AmplifiedFragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), and Simple Sequence Repeats(SSRs) which are also referred to as Microsatellites, Single NucleotidePolymorphisms (SNPs), enhanced selection, genetic markers, enhancedselection and transformation. Seeds, sweet corn plants, and partsthereof produced by such breeding methods are also part of thedisclosure.

The disclosure also relates to variants, mutants and trivialmodifications of the seed or plant of the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN orinbred parental lines thereof. Variants, mutants and trivialmodifications of the seed or plant of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN orinbred parental lines thereof can be generated by methods available toone skilled in the art, including but not limited to, mutagenesis (e.g.,chemical mutagenesis, radiation mutagenesis, transposon mutagenesis,insertional mutagenesis, signature tagged mutagenesis, site-directedmutagenesis, and natural mutagenesis), knock-outs/knock-ins, antisenseoligonucleotides, RNA interference and other techniques such as the NewBreeding Techniques described herein. For more information ofmutagenesis in plants, such as agents or protocols, see Acquaah et al.(Principles of plant genetics and breeding, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, ISBN1405136464, 9781405136464, which is herein incorporated by reference inits entity).

The disclosure also relates to a mutagenized population of the hybridsweet corn COACHMAN and methods of using such populations. In someembodiments, the mutagenized population can be used in screening for newsweet corn plants which comprise essentially one or more of or all ofthe morphological and physiological characteristics of hybrid sweet cornCOACHMAN. In some embodiments, the new sweet corn plants obtained fromthe screening process comprise essentially all of the morphological andphysiological characteristics of the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, and oneor more additional or different morphological and physiologicalcharacteristics that the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN does not have.

This disclosure is also directed to methods for producing a sweet cornplant by crossing a first parent sweet corn plant with a second parentsweet corn plant, wherein either the first or second parent sweet cornplant is a hybrid sweet corn plant of COACHMAN. Further, both first andsecond parent sweet corn plants can come from the hybrid sweet cornplant COACHMAN. Further, the hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN can beself-pollinated i.e. the pollen of a hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMANcan pollinate the ovule of the same hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN.When crossed with another sweet corn plant, a hybrid seed is produced.Such methods of hybridization and self-pollination are well known tothose skilled in the art of breeding.

An inbred sweet corn line such as one of the parental lines of hybridsweet corn COACHMAN has been produced through several cycles ofself-pollination and is therefore to be considered as a homozygous line.An inbred line can also be produced though the dihaploid system whichinvolves doubling the chromosomes from a haploid plant or embryo thusresulting in an inbred line that is genetically stable (homozygous) andcan be reproduced without altering the inbred line. Haploid plants couldbe obtained from haploid embryos that might be produced frommicrospores, pollen, anther cultures or ovary cultures or spontaneoushaploidy. The haploid embryos may then be doubled by chemical treatmentssuch as by colchicine or be doubled autonomously. The haploid embryosmay also be grown into haploid plants and treated to induce thechromosome doubling. In either case, fertile homozygous plants areobtained. A hybrid variety is classically created through thefertilization of an ovule from an inbred parental line by the pollen ofanother, different inbred parental line. Due to the homozygous state ofthe inbred line, the produced gametes carry a copy of each parentalchromosome. As both the ovule and the pollen bring a copy of thearrangement and organization of the genes present in the parental lines,the genome of each parental line is present in the resulting F1 hybrid,theoretically in the arrangement and organization created by the plantbreeder in the original parental line.

As long as the homozygosity of the parental lines is maintained, theresulting hybrid cross shall be stable. The F1 hybrid is then acombination of phenotypic characteristics issued from two arrangementand organization of genes, both created by a person skilled in the artthrough the breeding process.

Still further, this disclosure is also directed to methods for producinga sweet corn plant derived from hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN by crossinghybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN with a second sweet corn plant. In someembodiments, the methods further comprise obtaining a progeny seed fromthe cross. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise growing theprogeny seed, and possibly repeating the crossing and growing steps withthe hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN derived plant from 0 to 7 or moretimes. Thus, any such methods using the hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMANare part of this disclosure: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production,crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using hybridsweet corn plant COACHMAN as a parent are within the scope of thisdisclosure, including plants derived from hybrid sweet corn plantCOACHMAN. In some embodiments, such plants have one, more than one orall of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the hybridsweet corn plant COACHMAN including but not limited to as determined atthe 5% significance level when grown in the same environmentalconditions. In some embodiments, such plants might exhibit additionaland desired characteristics or traits such as high seed yield, high seedgermination, seedling vigor, early maturity, high yield, diseasetolerance or resistance, lodging resistance, and adaptability for soiland climate conditions. Consumer-driven traits, such as a preference fora given ear size, kernel color, kernel texture, kernel taste, kernelfirmness, kernel sugar content are other traits that may be incorporatedinto new sweet corn plants developed by this disclosure.

A sweet corn plant can also be propagated vegetatively. A part of theplant, for example a shoot tissue, is collected, and a new plant isobtained from the part. Such part typically comprises an apical meristemof the plant. The collected part is transferred to a medium allowingdevelopment of a plantlet, including for example rooting or developmentof shoots, or is grafted onto a sweet corn plant or a rootstock preparedto support growth of shoot tissue. This is achieved using methods wellknown in the art. Accordingly, in one embodiment, a method ofvegetatively propagating a plant of the present disclosure comprisescollecting a part of a plant according to the present disclosure, e.g. ashoot tissue, and obtaining a plantlet from said part. In oneembodiment, a method of vegetatively propagating a plant of the presentdisclosure comprises: (a) collecting tissue of a plant of the presentdisclosure; (b) rooting said proliferated shoots to obtain rootedplantlets. In one embodiment, a method of vegetatively propagating aplant of the present disclosure comprises: (a) collecting tissue of aplant of the present disclosure; (b) cultivating said tissue to obtainproliferated shoots; (c) rooting said proliferated shoots to obtainrooted plantlets. In one embodiment, such method further comprisesgrowing a plant from said plantlets. In one embodiment, an ear isharvested from said plant. In one embodiment, such ears, kernels andplants have all of the physiological and morphological characteristicsof ears, kernels and plants of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANwhen grown in the same environmental conditions. In one embodiment, theear and/or its kernels is processed into products such as canned sweetcorn kernels and/or parts thereof, freeze dried or frozen kernel and/orparts thereof, fresh or prepared ear or kernels and parts thereof orpastes, powders, sauces, purees and the like.

The disclosure is also directed to the use of the hybrid sweet cornplant COACHMAN in a grafting process. In one embodiment, the hybridsweet corn plant COACHMAN is used as the scion while in anotherembodiment, the hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN is used as a rootstock.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a seed of hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN, wherein a representative sample of seedof said hybrid is deposited under NCIMB No. 44223.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn plant,or a part thereof, produced by growing the deposited COACHMAN seed.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn plantpart, wherein the sweet corn part is selected from the group consistingof: a leaf, a flower, a kernel, an ear, a stalk, a root, a rootstock, aseed, an embryo, a peduncle, a stamen, an anther, a pistil, an ovule, apollen, a cell, a rootstock, and a scion. In some embodiments, the partis selected from the group consisting of a leaf, a flower, an ear, astalk, a root, a rootstock, a scion, an embryo, a peduncle, a stamen, ananther, a pistil, a pollen, an ovule, a meristem, and a cell.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn plant,or a part thereof, having all the characteristics of hybrid sweet cornCOACHMAN of this disclosure including but not limited to as determinedat the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmentalconditions.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn plant,or a part thereof, having all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, wherein a representativesample of seed of said hybrid was deposited under NCIMB No. 44223.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a tissue culture ofregenerable cells produced from the plant or part grown from thedeposited COACHMAN seed, wherein cells of the tissue culture areproduced from a plant part selected from the group consisting ofprotoplasts, embryos, meristematic cells, callus, pollens, ovules,flowers, seeds, leaves, roots, root tips, anthers, stems, petioles,fruits, axillary buds, cotyledons and hypocotyls. In some embodiments,the plant part includes protoplasts produced from a plant grown from thedeposited COACHMAN seed.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a compositioncomprising regenerable cells produced from the plant or part thereofgrown from the deposited hybrid COACHMAN seed, or other part or cellthereof. In some embodiments, the composition further comprises a growthmedia. In some embodiments, the growth media is solid or a syntheticcultivation medium. In some embodiments, the composition is a sweet cornplant regenerated from the tissue culture from a plant grown from thedeposited COACHMAN seed, said plant having all of the characteristics ofhybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, wherein a representative sample of seed ofsaid hybrid is deposited under NCIMB No. 44223.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn earsand kernels produced from the plant grown from the deposited COACHMANseed.

In some embodiments, such kernels have all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANkernels when grown in the same environmental conditions.

In some embodiments, methods of producing said sweet corn ear comprise(a) growing the sweet corn plant from deposited COACHMAN seed to producea sweet corn ear, and (b) harvesting said sweet corn ear. In someembodiments, the present disclosure also teaches a sweet corn earproduced by the method of producing sweet corn ears and/or kernels asdescribed above. In some embodiments, such ear and kernels have all ofthe physiological and morphological characteristics of ear and kernelsof hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN (e.g. those listed in Table 1and/or deposited under NCIMB No. 44223) when grown in the sameenvironmental conditions.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods forproducing a sweet corn seed comprising crossing a first parent sweetcorn plant with a second parent sweet corn plant and harvesting theresultant sweet corn seed, wherein said first parent sweet corn plantand/or second parent sweet corn plant is the sweet corn plant producedfrom the deposited COACHMAN seed or a sweet corn plant having all of thecharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No.44223 including but not limited to as determined at the 5% significancelevel when grown in the same environmental conditions.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods forproducing a sweet corn seed comprising self-pollinating the sweet cornplant grown from the deposited COACHMAN seed and harvesting theresultant sweet corn seed.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches the seed produced byany of the above described methods.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods ofvegetatively propagating the sweet corn plant grown from the depositedCOACHMAN seed, said method comprising collecting a part of a plant grownfrom the deposited COACHMAN seed and regenerating a plant from saidpart.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises harvesting an earand/or kernels and/or seeds from said vegetatively propagated plant. Insome embodiments, the method further comprises harvesting ears, kernels,and/or seeds from said vegetatively propagated plant.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches the plant, and ears,kernels and/or seeds of plants vegetatively propagated from parts ofplants grown from the deposited COACHMAN seed. In some embodiments, suchplants, and ears, kernels and/or seeds thereof have all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of COACHMAN plant, andears, kernels and/or seeds of hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN (e.g. thoselisted in Table 1 and/or deposited under NCIMB No. 44223) when grown inthe same environmental conditions.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods of producinga sweet corn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In someembodiment, the methods comprise (a) self-pollinating the plant grownfrom the deposited COACHMAN seed at least once to produce a progenyplant derived from sweet corn hybrid COACHMAN. In some embodiments, themethod further comprises (b) crossing the progeny plant derived fromsweet corn hybrid COACHMAN with itself or a second sweet corn plant toproduce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation; and; (c)growing the progeny plant of the subsequent generation from the seed,and (d) crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generation withitself or a second sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plantderived from the hybrid sweet corn variety COACHMAN. In some embodimentssaid methods further comprise the step of: (e) repeating steps (b), (c)and/or (d) for at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or more generation toproduce a sweet corn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn varietyCOACHMAN.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods of producinga sweet corn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN, themethods comprising (a) crossing the plant grown from the depositedCOACHMAN seed with a second sweet corn plant to produce a progeny plantderived from hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN. In some embodiments, the methodfurther comprises; (b) crossing the progeny plant derived from hybridsweet corn COACHMAN with itself or a second sweet corn plant to producea seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation; and; (c) growingthe progeny plant of the subsequent generation from the seed; (d)crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generation with itself or asecond sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plant derived from thehybrid sweet corn variety COACHMAN. In some embodiments said methodsfurther comprise the steps of: (e) repeating steps (b), (c) and/or (d)for at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or more generations to produce a sweetcorn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn variety COACHMAN.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches plants grown fromthe deposited COACHMAN seed wherein said plants comprise a single locusconversion. As used herein, the term “a” or “an” refers to one or moreof that entity; for example, “a single locus conversion” refers to oneor more single locus conversions or at least one single locusconversion. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “atleast one” are used interchangeably herein. In addition, reference to“an element” by the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude thepossibility that more than one of the elements are present, unless thecontext clearly requires that there is one and only one of the elements.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a method ofproducing a plant of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN comprising atleast one desired trait, the method comprising introducing a singlelocus conversion conferring the desired trait into hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, whereby a plant of hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN comprising the desired trait is produced.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches a sweet corn plant,comprising a single locus conversion and essentially all of thecharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN deposited underNCIMB No. 44223. In other embodiments, the single locus conversion isintroduced into the plant by the use of recurrent selection, mutationbreeding, wherein said mutation breeding selects for a mutation that isspontaneous or artificially induced, backcrossing, pedigree breeding,haploid/double haploid production, marker-assisted selection, genetictransformation, genomic selection, synthetic genomics, Zinc fingernuclease (ZFN), oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis, cisgenesis,intragenesis, RNA-dependent DNA methylation, agro-infiltration,Transcription Activation-Like Effector Nuclease (TALEN), CRISPR/Cassystem, engineered meganuclease, engineered homing endonuclease, and DNAguided genome editing. In further embodiments, the single locusconversion is introduced into the plant by a genetic transformation or agene-editing technique with a nuclease selected from the groupconsisting of zinc finger nucleases, transcription activator-likeeffector nucleases (TALENs), RNA-guided nucleases, engineered homingendonucleases, engineered meganucleases, and clustered regularlyinterspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas).

A further embodiment relates to a method for developing a sweet cornplant in a sweet corn plant breeding program, comprising applying plantbreeding techniques comprising crossing, recurrent selection, mutationbreeding, wherein said mutation breeding selects for a mutation that isspontaneous or artificially induced, backcrossing, pedigree breeding,marker enhanced selection, haploid/double haploid production, or genetictransformation to the sweet corn plant of ‘COACHMAN’, or its parts,wherein application of said techniques results in development of a sweetcorn plant.

A further embodiment relates to a method of introducing a mutation intothe genome of sweet corn plant ‘COACHMAN’, said method comprisingmutagenesis of the plant, or plant part thereof, of ‘COACHMAN’, whereinsaid mutagenesis is selected from the group consisting of temperature,long-term seed storage, tissue culture conditions, ionizing radiation,chemical mutagens, and targeting induced local lesions in genomes, andwherein the resulting plant comprises at least one genome mutation andproducing plants therefrom.

A further embodiment relates to a method of editing the genome of sweetcorn plant ‘COACHMAN’, wherein said method is selected agene/genome-editing technique with a nuclease selected from the groupconsisting of from the group comprising zinc finger nucleases,transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), RNA-guidednucleases, engineered homing endonucleases, engineered meganucleases,and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas), and plants produced therefrom.

In some embodiments, the plant comprises 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,or more single locus conversions. In some embodiments, the plantcomprises no more than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 single locusconversions, but essentially all of the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN deposited underNCIMB No. 44223. In some embodiments, the plant comprises at least onesingle locus conversion and essentially all the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMANdeposited under NCIMB No. 44223. In other embodiments, the plantcomprises one single locus conversion and essentially all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweet cornplant COACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No. 44223.

In some embodiments said single locus conversion confers said plantswith a trait selected from the group consisting of male sterility, malefertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance forbacterial, fungal, mycoplasma or viral disease, enhanced plant qualitysuch as improved drought or salt tolerance, water stress tolerance,improved standability, enhanced plant vigor, improved shelf life,delayed senescence or controlled ripening, increased nutritional qualitysuch as increased sugar content or increased sweetness, increasedtexture, flavor and aroma, improved ear length and/or size, protectionfor color, kernel shape, uniformity, length or diameter, refinement ordepth lodging resistance, yield and recovery when compared to a suitablecheck/comparison plant. In further embodiments, the single locusconversion confers said plant with herbicide resistance.

In some embodiments, the check plant is a hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN nothaving said single locus conversion conferring the desired trait(s). Insome embodiments, at least one single locus conversion is anaturally-occurring spontaneous mutation, an induced mutation or a geneor nucleotide sequence modified through the use of New BreedingTechniques.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure teaches methods of producinga sweet corn plant, comprising grafting a rootstock or a scion of thehybrid sweet corn plant grown from the deposited COACHMAN seed toanother sweet corn plant. In some embodiments, the present disclosureteaches methods for producing nucleic acids, comprising isolatingnucleic acids from the plant grown from the deposited COACHMAN seed, ora part, or a cell thereof. In some embodiments, the present disclosureteaches methods for producing a second sweet corn plant, comprisingapplying plant breeding techniques to the plant grown from the depositedCOACHMAN seed, or part thereof to produce the second sweet corn plant.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides a method ofproducing a commodity plant product comprising collecting the commodityplant product from the plant of the present disclosure. The commodityplant product produced by said method is also part of the presentdisclosure.

In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above,further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by study of thefollowing descriptions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE Definitions

In the description and tables that follow, a number of terms are used.In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of thespecification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms,the following definitions are provided:

Adaptability: A plant that has adaptability is a plant able to grow wellin different growing conditions (climate, soils, etc.).

Allele: An allele is variant form of a gene or locus.

Androecious plant: A plant having staminate flowers only.

Backcrossing: Backcrossing is a process in which a breeder repeatedlycrosses hybrid progeny back to one of the parents, for example, afirst-generation hybrid F₁ with one of the parental genotypes of the F₁hybrid.

Commodity plant product: A “commodity plant product” refers to anycomposition or product that is comprised of material derived from aplant, seed, plant cell, or plant part of the present disclosure.Commodity plant products may be sold to consumers and can be viable ornonviable. Nonviable commodity products include but are not limited tononviable seeds and grains; processed seeds, seed parts, and plantparts; dehydrated plant tissue, frozen plant tissue, and processed planttissue; seeds and plant parts processed for animal feed for terrestrialand/or aquatic animal consumption, oil, meal, flour, flakes, bran,fiber, paper, tea, coffee, silage, crushed of whole grain, and any otherfood for human or animal consumption; biomasses and fuel products; andraw material in industry.

Collection of seeds: In the context of the present disclosure acollection of seeds is a grouping of seeds mainly containing similarkind of seeds, for example hybrid seeds of the disclosure, but that mayalso contain, mixed together with this first kind of seeds, a second,different kind of seeds, of one of the inbred parent lines, for examplethe inbred line of the present disclosure. A commercial bag of hybridseeds having the hybrid seeds of the disclosure and containing also theinbred parental line seeds would be, for example such a collection ofseeds.

Daily heat unit value. The daily heat unit value is calculated asfollows: (the maximum daily temperature+the minimum daily temperature)/2minus 50. All temperatures are in degrees Fahrenheit. The maximumtemperature threshold is 86 degrees, if temperatures exceed this, 86 isused. The minimum temperature threshold is 50 degrees, if temperaturesgo below this, 50 is used.

Decreased vigor: A plant having a decreased vigor in the presentdisclosure is a plant that, compared to other plants has a less vigorousappearance for vegetative and/or reproductive characteristics includingbut not limited to shorter plant height, smaller ear size, ear andkernel shape, ear color, fewer kernel or other characteristics.

Endosperm Type: Endosperm type refers to endosperm genes and otherquality affecting modifiers and types such as starch, sugary alleles(su1, su2, etc.), sugary enhancer (se1) or extender, waxy, amyloseextender, dull, brittle alleles (bt1, bt2, etc.) shrunken-2 (sh2) andother sh alleles, and any combination of these.

Easy to pick ears: An ear that is easy to pick is an ear that easilydetaches from the plant. Once grabbed and twisted, the ear will breakbetween the peduncle and the stem. For ears not easy to pick, thepeduncle breaks off the ear. An ear that is easy to pick is also an earthat is easily accessible for harvest. When plants have an open planthabit, the ears are harvested more easily than when the plants haveclosed habit.

Enhanced nutritional quality: The nutritional quality of the sweet cornof the present disclosure can be enhanced by the introduction of severaltraits comprising a higher endosperm sugar content, increased sweetness,a thinner pericarp, various endosperm types or mutants. Examples ofgenes governing such traits are the “sugary” gene (su1), the “SugaryEnhancer” gene (se1) and the “Shrunken-2” gene (sh2).

Essentially all of the physiological and morphological characteristics:A plant having essentially all the physiological and morphologicalcharacteristics means a plant having all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of a plant of the present disclosure,except for additional traits and/or mutations which do not materiallyaffect the plant of the present disclosure, or desiredcharacteristic(s), which can be indirectly obtained from another plantpossessing at least one single locus conversion via a conventionalbreeding program (such as backcross breeding) or directly obtained byintroduction of at least one single locus conversion via New BreedingTechniques. In some embodiments, one of the non-limiting examples for aplant having (and/or comprising) essentially all of the physiologicaland morphological characteristics shall be a plant having all of thephysiological and morphological characteristics of a plant of thepresent disclosure other than desired, additionaltrait(s)/characteristic(s) conferred by a single locus conversionincluding, but not limited to, a converted or modified gene.

Field holding ability: Field holding ability is the ability for kernelquality to maintain even after kernel is ripe.

Grafting: Grafting is the operation by which a rootstock is grafted witha scion. The primary motive for grafting is to avoid damages bysoil-born pest and pathogens when genetic or chemical approaches fordisease management are not available. Grafting a susceptible scion ontoa resistant rootstock can provide a resistant cultivar without the needto breed the resistance into the cultivar. In addition, grafting mayenhance tolerance to abiotic stress, increase yield and result in moreefficient water and nutrient uses.

HTU: HTU is the summation of the daily heat unit value calculated fromemergence to harvest.

Good Seed Producer: A plant is a good seed producer when it producesnumerous seeds. For sweet corn, a good seed producing plant will producean average of 20 grams of seeds during the harvest season.

Gynoecious plant: A plant having pistillate flowers only.

Immunity to disease(s) and or insect(s): A sweet corn plant which is notsubject to attack or infection by specific disease(s) and or insect(s)is considered immune.

Industrial usage: The industrial usage of the sweet corn of the presentdisclosure comprises the use of the sweet corn ears or kernels forconsumption, whether as fresh products or in canning, freezing or anyother industries.

Intermediate resistance to disease(s) and or insect(s): A sweet cornplant that restricts the growth and development of specific disease(s)and or insect(s), but may exhibit a greater range of symptoms or damagecompared to a resistant plant. Intermediate resistant plants willusually show less severe symptoms or damage than susceptible plantvarieties when grown under similar environmental conditions and/orspecific disease(s) and or insect(s) pressure, but may have heavy damageunder heavy pressure. Intermediate resistant sweet corn plants are notimmune to the disease(s) and or insect(s).

Maturity: In the region of best adaptability, maturity is the number ofdays from seeding to harvesting.

New Breeding Techniques: New breeding techniques (NBTs) are said ofvarious new technologies developed and/or used to create newcharacteristics in plants through genetic variation, the aim beingtargeted mutagenesis, targeted introduction of new genes or genesilencing. The following breeding techniques are within the scope ofNBTs: targeted sequence changes facilitated through the use of Zincfinger nuclease (ZFN) technology (ZFN-1, ZFN-2 and ZFN-3, see U.S. Pat.No. 9,145,565, incorporated by reference in its entirety),Oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis (ODM, a.k.a., site-directedmutagenesis), Cisgenesis and intragenesis, epigenetic approaches such asRNA-dependent DNA methylation (RdDM, which does not necessarily changenucleotide sequence but can change the biological activity of thesequence), Grafting (on GM rootstock), Reverse breeding,Agro-infiltration for transient gene expression (agro-infiltration“sensu stricto”, agro-inoculation, floral dip), genome editing withendonucleases such as chemical nucleases, engineered meganuclease,engineered homing endonucleases, ZFNs, Transcription Activator-LikeEffector Nucleases (TALENs, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,586,363 and 9,181,535,incorporated by reference in their entireties), the CRISPR/Cas systemincluding RNA-guided endonucleases (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,697,359;8,771,945; 8,795,965; 8,865,406; 8,871,445; 8,889,356; 8,895,308;8,906,616; 8,932,814; 8,945,839; 8,993,233; and 8,999,641, which are allhereby incorporated by reference), DNA guided genome editing (Gao etal., Nature Biotechnology (2016), doi: 10.1038/nbt.3547, incorporated byreference in its entirety), and Synthetic genomics. A major part oftoday's targeted genome editing, another designation for New BreedingTechniques, is the applications to induce a DNA double strand break(DSB) at a selected location in the genome where the modification isintended. Directed repair of the DSB allows for targeted genome editing.Such applications can be utilized to generate mutations (e.g., targetedmutations or precise native gene editing) as well as precise insertionof genes (e.g., cisgenes, intragenes, or transgenes). The applicationsleading to mutations are often identified as site-directed nuclease(SDN) technology, such as SDN1, SDN2 and SDN3. For SDN1, the outcome isa targeted, non-specific genetic deletion mutation: the position of theDNA DSB is precisely selected, but the DNA repair by the host cell israndom and results in small nucleotide deletions, additions orsubstitutions. For SDN2, a SDN is used to generate a targeted DSB and aDNA repair template (a short DNA sequence identical to the targeted DSBDNA sequence except for one or a few nucleotide changes) is used torepair the DSB: this results in a targeted and predetermined pointmutation in the desired gene of interest. As to the SDN3, the SDN isused along with a DNA repair template that contains new DNA sequence(e.g. gene). The outcome of the technology would be the integration ofthat DNA sequence into the plant genome. The most likely applicationillustrating the use of SDN3 would be the insertion of cisgenic,intragenic, or transgenic expression cassettes at a selected genomelocation. A complete description of each of these techniques can befound in the report made by the Joint Research Center (JRC) Institutefor Prospective Technological Studies of the European Commission in 2011and titled “New plant breeding techniques—State-of-the-art and prospectsfor commercial development”, which is incorporated by reference in itsentirety.

Plant adaptability: A plant having good plant adaptability means a plantthat will perform well in different growing conditions and seasons.

Plant cell: As used herein, the term “plant cell” includes plant cellswhether isolated, in tissue culture, or incorporated in a plant or plantpart.

Plant Part: As used herein, the term “plant part”, “part thereof” or“parts thereof” includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant celltissue cultures from which sweet corn plants can be regenerated, plantcalli, plant clumps and plant cells that are intact in plants or partsof plants, such as embryos, pollens, ovules, flowers, seeds, ears,kernels, rootstocks, scions, stems, roots, anthers, pistils, root tips,leaves, meristematic cells, axillary buds, hypocotyls, cotyledons,ovaries, seed coats, endosperms and the like. In some embodiments, theplant part at least comprises at least one cell of said plant. In someembodiments, the plant part is further defined as a pollen, a meristem,a cell or an ovule. In some embodiments, a plant regenerated from theplant part has all of the phenotypic and morphological characteristicsof a sweet corn hybrid of the present disclosure, including but notlimited to as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in thesame environmental conditions.

Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Quantitative trait loci refer to geneticloci that control to some degree numerically representable traits thatare usually continuously distributed.

Regeneration: Regeneration refers to the development of a plant fromtissue culture.

Resistance to disease(s) and or insect(s): A sweet corn plant thatrestricts the growth and development of specific disease(s) and orinsect(s) under normal disease(s) and or insect(s) attack pressure whencompared to susceptible plants. These sweet corn plants can exhibit somesymptoms or damage under heavy disease(s) and or insect(s) pressure.Resistant sweet corn plants are not immune to the disease(s) and orinsect(s).

Root Lodging: The root lodging is the percentage of plants that rootlodge; i.e., those that lean from the vertical axis at an approximate 30degree angle or greater would be counted as root lodged.

Rootstock: A rootstock is the lower part of a plant capable of receivinga scion in a grafting process.

Scion: A scion is the higher part of a plant capable of being graftedonto a rootstock in a grafting process.

Single locus converted (conversion): Single locus converted (conversion)plants refer to plants which are developed by a plant breeding techniquecalled backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphologicaland physiological characteristics of a plant are recovered in additionto a single locus transferred into the plant via the backcrossingtechnique or via genetic engineering. A single locus converted plant canalso be referred to a plant with a single locus conversion obtainedthough spontaneous and/or induced mutagenesis or through the use of NewBreeding Techniques described in the present disclosure. In someembodiments, the single locus converted plant has essentially all of thedesired morphological and physiological characteristics of the originalvariety in addition to a single locus converted by spontaneous and/orinduced mutations, which is introduced and/or transferred into the plantby the plant breeding techniques such as backcrossing. In otherembodiments, the single locus converted plant has essentially all of thedesired morphological and physiological characteristics of the originalvariety in addition to a single locus, gene or nucleotide sequence(s)converted, mutated, modified or engineered through the New BreedingTechniques taught herein. In the present disclosure, single locusconverted (conversion) can be interchangeably referred to single geneconverted (conversion).

Susceptible to disease(s) and or insect(s): A sweet corn plant that issusceptible to disease(s) and or insect(s) is defined as a sweet cornplant that has the inability to restrict the growth and development ofspecific disease(s) and or insect(s). Plants that are susceptible willshow damage when infected and are more likely to have heavy damage undermoderate levels of specific disease(s) and or insect(s).

Tolerance to abiotic stresses: A sweet corn plant that is tolerant toabiotic stresses has the ability to endure abiotic stress withoutserious consequences for growth, appearance and yield.

Uniformity: Uniformity, as used herein, describes the similarity betweenplants or plant characteristics which can be a described by qualitativeor quantitative measurements.

Variety: A plant variety as used by one skilled in the art of plantbreeding means a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of thelowest known rank which can be defined by the expression of thecharacteristics resulting from a given genotype or combination ofphenotypes, distinguished from any other plant grouping by theexpression of at least one of the said characteristics and considered asa unit with regard to its suitability for being propagated unchanged(International convention for the protection of new varieties ofplants). The term “variety” can be interchangeably used with “cultivar”,“line” or “hybrid in the present application”.

Yield: The yield is the tons of green corn or green weight per acre. Itcan also be defined as the number of ears per acre or per plant.

Sweet Corn Plants

Sweet corn is a particular type of maize (Zea mays, often referred to ascorn in the United States). Sweet corn naturally mutated from fieldcorn, with origins that are traced back to the Native Americans. Sweetcorn is harvested at an earlier maturity than field corn (before it isdry), for a different purpose, usually fresh produce, canning orfreezing, for human consumption, or to be eaten fresh on the cob,steamed or grilled. It has been bred therefore to be qualitatively andquantitatively different from field corn in a number of respects.

Early varieties, including those used by Native Americans, were theresult of the mutant su1 (“sugary”) allele. The sweet corn (su1)mutation causes the endosperm (storage area) of the seed to accumulateabout two times more sugar than field corn. Today many sweet corn (su1)varieties are available. They contain about 5-10% sugar by weight.

Supersweet corns are varieties of sweet corn which produce higher thannormal levels of sugar, first recognized by University of Illinois atUrbana—Champaign professor John Laughnan. He was investigating twospecific genes in sweet corn, one of which, the sh2 (shrunken2) genecaused the corn to shrivel when dry. After further investigationLaughnan discovered that the endosperm of sh2 sweet corn kernels storeless starch and from 4 to 10 times more sugar than standard sugary sweetcorn. Texture is crispy rather than creamy as with the standard andsugary enhanced varieties. Fresh market shelf life is extended due tothe ability of the kernels to retain moisture and sweetness for longerperiods of time. He published his findings in 1953, disclosing theadvantages of growing supersweet sweet corn, but many corn breederslacked enthusiasm for the new supersweet corn. Illinois Foundation SeedsInc. was the first seed company to release a supersweet corn and it wascalled Illini Xtra-Sweet, but widespread use of supersweet hybrids didnot occur until the early 1980s. The popularity of supersweet corn rosedue to its long shelf life and higher sugar content when compared toconventional sweet corn. This has improved the viability and thus thelong-distance shipping of sweet corn and has enabled manufacturers tocan sweet corn without adding extra sugar.

The third gene mutation to be discovered is the se1 or “sugary enhanced”allele. Sugary enhancer corn results in slightly increased sugar levelsand a more creamy texture due to increased levels of water solublepolysaccharides. Kernels are also generally more tender.

All of the alleles responsible for sweet corn are recessive, so it mustbe isolated from any field corn varieties that release pollen at thesame time; the endosperm develops from genes from both parents, andheterozygous kernels will be tough and starchy. The se1 and su1 allelesdo not need to be isolated from each other as the change in quality ofthe sugary enhancer hybrids will not be that dramatic. Supersweetvarieties containing the sh2 allele must be grown in isolation fromother varieties to avoid cross-pollination and resulting starchiness,either in space (various sources quote minimum isolation distances from100 to 400 feet or 30 to 120 m) or in time (i.e., the supersweet corndoes not pollinate at the same time as other corn in nearby fields).

Sweet corn hybrids come in three colors: yellow, white, and bicolorbased on whether the parental lines are yellow or white.Cross-pollination of a yellow parental line by a white parental linewill result in seed of a hybrid that when grown will produce bicolorears Cross pollination of a yellow kernel hybrid by a bicolor or whitekernel hybrid will not change the kernel color of the yellow hybrid, butmay increase the percentage of yellow kernels on the bicolor or whitekernel hybrids. This is due to the dominant nature of the allele foryellow kernel color. Although there are geographical preferences forcertain kernel colors, there is no relationship between color andsweetness.

There are numerous steps in the development of any novel, desirableplant germplasm. Plant breeding begins with the analysis and definitionof problems and weaknesses of the current germplasm, the establishmentof program goals, and the definition of specific breeding objectives.The next step is selection of germplasm that possesses the traits tomeet the program goals. The goal is to combine in a single variety orhybrid an improved combination of desirable traits from the parentalgermplasm.

In sweet corn these important traits include the ability of the seeds toemerge with vigor and uniformity, a strong plant type that resistslodging, a plant that carries some level of resistance for disease orinsects, a high number of fresh ears or kernels that are produced on aunit of ground, good coverage of the husk leaves over the tip of theear, easy removal of the ear from the stalk with a short shankattachment, a cylindrical ear shape and good balance between the ear'slength and diameter, kernels arranged in 14 to 20 straight rows withgood kernel depth and color, good kernel fill at the tip of the ear andgood canned, frozen and/or fresh eating quality determined by thetenderness, aroma, sweetness and flavor of the sweet corn kernels.

In some embodiments, particularly desirable traits that may beincorporated by this disclosure are improved resistance to differentviral, fungal, and bacterial pathogens. Important diseases include butare not limited to Northern Leaf blight (caused by Exserohilum turcicum,previously called Helminthosporium turcicum), Common Rust (caused byPuccinia sorghi), “Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus (caused by MDMV strain A”,Sugar Cane Mosaic Virus (caused by SCMV formally known as MDMV strainB), tropical rust (caused by the fungal pathogen Physopella zeae(Mains), grey leaf spot (fungal disease associated with Cercospora spp),Goss's wilt (caused by the bacterial pathogen Clavibacter michiganensissubsp. nebraskensis (CN)), Stewart's Bacterial Wilt (caused by Pantoeastewartii), High Plains Virus (caused by HPV),” etc. Improved resistanceto insect pests is another desirable trait that may be incorporated intonew sweet corn plants developed by this disclosure. Insect pestsaffecting sweet corn include, but not limited to European corn borer,corn earworm, corn wireworm, Western bean cutworm fall armyworm, fleabeetles, sap beetles etc.

Sweet Corn Breeding

The goal of sweet corn breeding is to develop new, unique and superiorsweet corn inbred lines and hybrids. The breeder initially selects andcrosses two or more parental lines, followed by repeated selfing andselection, producing many new genetic combinations. Another method usedto develop new, unique and superior sweet corn inbred lines and hybridsoccurs when the breeder selects and crosses two or more parental linesfollowed by haploid induction and chromosome doubling that result in thedevelopment of dihaploid inbred lines. The breeder can theoreticallygenerate billions of different genetic combinations via crossing,selfing and mutations and the same is true for the utilization of thedihaploid breeding method.

During the development of new sweet corn inbreds and hybrids, the sweetcorn breeder uses sweet corn plants, but also non-commercial sweet cornplants, such as plants that may contain characteristics that the breederhas interest in having in its sweet corn inbreds and hybrids. Suchnon-commercial sweet corn plants could be regular field corn, or wildrelatives of corn such as teosinte.

Each year, the plant breeder selects the germplasm to advance to thenext generation. This germplasm is grown under unique and differentgeographical, climatic and soil conditions, and further selections arethen made, during and at the end of the growing season. The inbred linesdeveloped are unpredictable. This unpredictability is because thebreeder's selection occurs in unique environments, with no control atthe DNA level (using conventional breeding procedures or dihaploidbreeding procedures), and with millions of different possible geneticcombinations being generated. A breeder of ordinary skill in the artcannot predict the final resulting lines the breeder develops, exceptpossibly in a very gross and general fashion. This unpredictabilityresults in the expenditure of large research monies to develop superiornew sweet corn inbred lines and hybrids.

The development of commercial sweet corn hybrids requires thedevelopment of homozygous inbred lines, the crossing of these lines, andthe evaluation of the hybrid crosses.

Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are used todevelop inbred lines from breeding populations. Breeding programscombine desirable traits from two or more inbred lines or variousbroad-based sources into breeding pools from which inbred lines aredeveloped by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes or through thedihaploid breeding method followed by the selection of desiredphenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and thehybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which havecommercial potential.

Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plantreproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and thetype of cultivar used commercially (e.g., F hybrid cultivar, purelinecultivar, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superiorindividual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective,whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based onmean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of relatedplants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection,modified pedigree selection, mass selection, recurrent selection, andbackcross breeding.

i. Pedigree Selection

Pedigree breeding is used commonly for the improvement ofself-pollinating crops or inbred lines of cross-pollinating crops. Twoparents possessing favorable, complementary traits are crossed toproduce an F₁. An F₂ population is produced by selfing one or several Fis or by intercrossing two F is (sib mating). The dihaploid breedingmethod could also be used. Selection of the best individuals is usuallybegun in the F₂ population; then, beginning in the F₃, the bestindividuals in the best families are selected. Replicated testing offamilies, or hybrid combinations involving individuals of thesefamilies, often follows in the F₄ generation to improve theeffectiveness of selection for traits with low heritability. At anadvanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F₆ and F₇), the best lines ormixtures of phenotypically similar lines are tested for potential use asparents of new hybrid cultivars. Similarly, the development of newinbred lines through the dihaploid system requires the selection of thebest inbreds followed by two to five years of testing in hybridcombinations in replicated plots.

The single-seed descent procedure in the strict sense refers to plantinga segregating population, harvesting a sample of one seed per plant, andusing the one-seed sample to plant the next generation. When thepopulation has been advanced from the F2 to the desired level ofinbreeding, the plants from which lines are derived will each trace todifferent F2 individuals. The number of plants in a population declineseach generation due to failure of some seeds to germinate or some plantsto produce at least one seed. As a result, not all of the F2 plantsoriginally sampled in the population will be represented by a progenywhen generation advance is completed.

In a multiple-seed procedure, breeders commonly harvest one or more earscontaining seed from each plant in a population and blend them togetherto form a bulk seed lot. Part of the bulked seed is used to plant thenext generation and part is put in reserve. The procedure has beenreferred to as modified single-seed descent or the bulk technique.

The multiple-seed procedure has been used to save labor at harvest. Itis considerably faster than removing one seed from each ear by hand forthe single seed procedure. The multiple-seed procedure also makes itpossible to plant the same number of seeds of a population eachgeneration of inbreeding. Enough seeds are harvested to make up forthose plants that did not germinate or produce seed.

Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used fordifferent traits and crops can be found in one of several referencebooks (e.g., R. W. Allard, 1960, Principles of Plant Breeding, JohnWiley and Son, pp. 115-161; N. W. Simmonds, 1979, Principles of CropImprovement, Longman Group Limited; W. R. Fehr, 1987, Principles of CropDevelopment, Macmillan Publishing Co.; N. F. Jensen, 1988, PlantBreeding Methodology, John Wiley & Sons).

ii. Backcross Breeding

Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for a simplyinherited, highly heritable trait into a desirable homozygous cultivaror inbred line which is the recurrent parent. The source of the trait tobe transferred is called the donor parent. The resulting plant isexpected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar)and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent. After theinitial cross, individuals possessing the phenotype of the recurrentparent and the trait of interest from the donor parent are selected andrepeatedly crossed (backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. The resultingplant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g.,cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent.

When the term hybrid sweet corn plant is used in the context of thepresent disclosure, this also includes any hybrid sweet corn plant whereone or more desired traits have been introduced through backcrossingmethods, whether such trait is a naturally occurring one, a spontaneousor induced mutation, a transgenic one or a gene or a nucleotide sequencemodified by the use of New Breeding Techniques. Backcrossing methods canbe used with the present disclosure to improve or introduce one or morecharacteristic into the inbred parental line, thus potentiallyintroducing these traits into the hybrid sweet corn plant of the presentdisclosure. The term “backcrossing” as used herein refers to therepeated crossing of a hybrid progeny back to the recurrent parent,i.e., backcrossing one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine,or more times to the recurrent parent. The parental sweet corn plantwhich contributes the gene or the genes for the desired characteristicis termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers tothe fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcrossprotocol and therefore does not recur. The parental sweet corn plant towhich the gene or genes from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred isknown as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in thebackcrossing protocol.

In a typical backcross protocol, the original inbred of interest(recurrent parent) is crossed to or by a second inbred (nonrecurrentparent) that carries the gene or genes of interest to be transferred.The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to or bythe recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a sweet cornplant is obtained wherein all the desired morphological andphysiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered inthe converted plant, generally determined at a 5% significance levelwhen grown in the same environmental conditions, in addition to the geneor genes transferred from the nonrecurrent parent. It has to be notedthat some, one, two, three or more, self-pollination and growing ofpopulation might be included between two successive backcrosses. Indeed,an appropriate selection in the population produced by theself-pollination, i.e. selection for the desired trait and physiologicaland morphological characteristics of the recurrent parent might beequivalent to one, two or even three additional backcrosses in acontinuous series without rigorous selection, saving then time, moneyand effort to the breeder. A non-limiting example of such a protocolwould be the following: a) the first generation F1 produced by the crossof the recurrent parent A by the donor parent B is backcrossed to parentA, b) selection is practiced for the plants having the desired trait ofparent B, c) selected plant are self-pollinated to produce a populationof plants where selection is practiced for the plants having the desiredtrait of parent B and physiological and morphological characteristics ofparent A, d) the selected plants are backcrossed one, two, three, four,five, six, seven, eight, nine, or more times to parent A to produceselected backcross progeny plants comprising the desired trait of parentB and the physiological and morphological characteristics of parent A.Step (c) may or may not be repeated and included between the backcrossesof step (d).

The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for asuccessful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol isto alter or substitute one or more trait(s) or characteristic(s) in theoriginal inbred parental line in order to find it then in the hybridmade thereof. To accomplish this, a gene or genes of the recurrentinbred is modified or substituted with the desired gene or genes fromthe nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all the rest of thedesired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological andmorphological, constitution of the original inbred. The choice of theparticular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of thebackcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commerciallydesirable, agronomically important trait(s) to the plant. The exactbackcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic(s) or trait(s)being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Althoughbackcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic beingtransferred is a single gene and dominant allele, multiple genes andrecessive allele(s) may also be transferred and therefore, backcrossbreeding is by no means restricted to character(s) governed by one or afew genes. In fact, the number of genes might be less important that theidentification of the character(s) in the segregating population. Inthis instance it may then be necessary to introduce a test of theprogeny to determine if the desired characteristic(s) has beensuccessfully transferred. Such tests encompass visual inspection, simplecrossing, but also follow up of the characteristic(s) throughgenetically associated markers and molecular assisted breeding tools.For example, selection of progeny containing the transferred trait isdone by direct selection, visual inspection for a trait associated witha dominant allele, while the selection of progeny for a trait that istransferred via a recessive allele, such as the shrunken-2 starch mutantin sweet corn, requires selfing the progeny or using molecular markersto determine which plant carry the recessive allele(s).

Many single gene traits have been identified that are not regularlyselected for in the development of a new parental inbred of a hybridsweet corn plant according to the disclosure but that can be improved bybackcrossing techniques. Single gene traits may or may not betransgenic. Examples of these traits include but are not limited to,male sterility (such as a cms-C, cms-T and cms-S genes), waxy starch(such as the wx gene), herbicide resistance (such as dmEPSPS gene),resistance for bacterial, rust (such as Rpt-d), fungal (such as Ht2, Ht3and HtN genes), or viral disease (gene Wsm1, Wsm2 and Wsm3 forresistance to Maize dwarf mosaic virus), insect resistance, malefertility, enhanced nutritional quality, enhanced sugar content, yieldstability and yield enhancement. These genes are generally inheritedthrough the nucleus. Some known exceptions to this are the genes formale sterility, some of which are inherited cytoplasmically, but stillact as single gene traits. Several of these single gene traits aredescribed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,948,957 and 5,969,212, the disclosures ofwhich are specifically hereby incorporated by reference.

In 1981, the backcross method of breeding counted for 17% of the totalbreeding effort for inbred line development in the United States,accordingly to, Hallauer, A. R. et al. (1988) “Corn Breeding” Corn andCorn Improvement, No. 18, pp. 463-481.

The backcross breeding method provides a precise way of improvingvarieties that excel in a large number of attributes but are deficientin a few characteristics. (Page 150 of the Pr. R. W. Allard's 1960 book,published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Principles of Plant Breeding). Themethod makes use of a series of backcrosses to the variety to beimproved during which the character or the characters in whichimprovement is sought is maintained by selection. At the end of thebackcrossing the gene or genes being transferred unlike all other genes,will be heterozygous. Selfing after the last backcross produceshomozygosity for this gene pair(s) and, coupled with selection, willresult in a parental line of a hybrid variety with exactly oressentially the same adaptation, yielding ability and qualitycharacteristics of the recurrent parent but superior to that parent inthe particular characteristic(s) for which the improvement program wasundertaken. Therefore, this method provides the plant breeder with ahigh degree of genetic control of this work.

The method is scientifically exact because the morphological andagricultural features of the improved variety could be described inadvance and because a similar variety could, if it were desired, be breda second time by retracing the same steps (Briggs, “Breeding wheatsresistant to bunt by the backcross method”, 1930 Jour. Amer. Soc.Agron., 22: 289-244).

Backcrossing is a powerful mechanism for achieving homozygosity and anypopulation obtained by backcrossing must rapidly converge on thegenotype of the recurrent parent. When backcrossing is made the basis ofa plant breeding program, the genotype of the recurrent parent will betheoretically modified only with regards to genes being transferred,which are maintained in the population by selection.

Successful backcrosses are, for example, the transfer of stem rustresistance from ‘Hope’ wheat to ‘Bart wheat’ and even pursuing thebackcrosses with the transfer of bunt resistance to create ‘Bart 38’,having both resistances. Also highlighted by Allard is the successfultransfer of mildew, leaf spot and wilt resistances in California Commonalfalfa to create ‘Caliverde’. This new ‘Caliverde’ variety producedthrough the backcross process is indistinguishable from CaliforniaCommon except for its resistance to the three named diseases.

One of the advantages of the backcross method is that the breedingprogram can be carried out in almost every environment that will allowthe development of the character being transferred or when usingmolecular markers that can identify the trait of interest.

The backcross technique is not only desirable when breeding for diseaseresistance but also for the adjustment of morphological characters,color characteristics and simply inherited quantitative characters suchas earliness, plant height and seed size and shape. In this regard, amedium grain type variety, ‘Calady’, has been produced by Jones andDavis. As dealing with quantitative characteristics, they selected thedonor parent with the view of sacrificing some of the intensity of thecharacter for which it was chosen, i.e. grain size. ‘Lady Wright’, along grain variety was used as the donor parent and ‘Coloro’, a shortgrain one as the recurrent parent. After four backcrosses, the mediumgrain type variety ‘Calady’ was produced.

iii. Open-Pollinated Populations

The improvement of open-pollinated populations of such crops as rye,maize and sugar beets, herbage grasses, legumes such as alfalfa andclover, and tropical tree crops such as cacao, coconuts, oil palm andsome rubber, depends essentially upon changing gene-frequencies towardsfixation of favorable alleles while maintaining a high (but far frommaximal) degree of heterozygosity.

Uniformity in such populations is impossible and trueness-to-type in anopen-pollinated variety is a statistical feature of the population as awhole, not a characteristic of individual plants. Thus, theheterogeneity of open-pollinated populations contrasts with thehomogeneity (or virtually so) of inbred lines, clones and hybrids.

Population improvement methods fall naturally into two groups, thosebased on purely phenotypic selection, normally called mass selection,and those based on selection with progeny testing. Interpopulationimprovement utilizes the concept of open breeding populations; allowinggenes to flow from one population to another. Plants in one population(cultivar, strain, ecotype, or any germplasm source) are crossed eithernaturally (e.g., by wind) or by hand or by bees (commonly Apis melliferaL. or Megachile rotundata F.) with plants from other populations.Selection is applied to improve one (or sometimes both) population(s) byisolating plants with desirable traits from both sources.

There are basically two primary methods of open-pollinated populationimprovement.

First, there is the situation in which a population is changed en masseby a chosen selection procedure. The outcome is an improved populationthat is indefinitely propagated by random-mating within itself inisolation.

Second, the synthetic variety attains the same end result as populationimprovement, but is not itself propagable as such; it has to bereconstructed from parental lines or clones. These plant breedingprocedures for improving open-pollinated populations are well known tothose skilled in the art and comprehensive reviews of breedingprocedures routinely used for improving cross-pollinated plants areprovided in numerous texts and articles, including: Allard, Principlesof Plant Breeding, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1960); Simmonds, Principlesof Crop Improvement, Longman Group Limited (1979); Hallauer and Miranda,Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Iowa State University Press(1981); and, Jensen, Plant Breeding Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.(1988).

A) Mass Selection

Mass and recurrent selections can be used to improve populations ofeither self- or cross-pollinating crops. A genetically variablepopulation of heterozygous individuals is either identified or createdby intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selectedbased on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellentcombining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a newpopulation in which further cycles of selection are continued. In massselection, desirable individual plants are chosen, harvested, and theseed composited without progeny testing to produce the followinggeneration. Since selection is based on the maternal parent only, andthere is no control over pollination, mass selection amounts to a formof random mating with selection. As stated above, the purpose of massselection is to increase the proportion of superior genotypes in thepopulation.

B) Synthetics

A synthetic variety is produced by intercrossing a number of genotypesselected for good combining ability in all possible hybrid combinations,with subsequent maintenance of the variety by open pollination. Whetherparents are (more or less inbred) seed-propagated lines, as in somesugar beet and beans (Vicia) or clones, as in herbage grasses, cloversand alfalfa, makes no difference in principle. Parents are selected ongeneral combining ability, sometimes by test crosses or topcrosses, moregenerally by polycrosses. Parental seed lines may be deliberately inbred(e.g. by selfing or sib crossing). However, even if the parents are notdeliberately inbred, selection within lines during line maintenance willensure that some inbreeding occurs. Clonal parents will, of course,remain unchanged and highly heterozygous.

Whether a synthetic can go straight from the parental seed productionplot to the farmer or must first undergo one or more cycles ofmultiplication depends on seed production and the scale of demand forseed. In practice, grasses and clovers are generally multiplied once ortwice and are thus considerably removed from the original synthetic.

While mass selection is sometimes used, progeny testing is generallypreferred for polycrosses, because of their operational simplicity andobvious relevance to the objective, namely exploitation of generalcombining ability in a synthetic.

The number of parental lines or clones that enters a synthetic varieswidely. In practice, numbers of parental lines range from 10 to severalhundred, with 100-200 being the average. Broad based synthetics formedfrom 100 or more clones would be expected to be more stable during seedmultiplication than narrow based synthetics.

iv. Hybrids

A hybrid is an individual plant resulting from a cross between parentsof differing genotypes. Commercial hybrids are now used extensively inmany crops, including corn (maize), sorghum, sugarbeet, sunflower,broccoli and tomato as well as leafy vegetables such as lettuce. Hybridscan be formed in a number of different ways, including by crossing twoparents directly (single cross hybrids), by crossing a single crosshybrid with another parent (three-way or triple cross hybrids), or bycrossing two different hybrids (four-way or double cross hybrids).

Strictly speaking, most individuals in an out breeding (i.e.,open-pollinated) population are hybrids, but the term is usuallyreserved for cases in which the parents are individuals whose genomesare sufficiently distinct for them to be recognized as different speciesor subspecies. Hybrids may be fertile or sterile depending onqualitative and/or quantitative differences in the genomes of the twoparents. Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is usually associated withincreased heterozygosity that results in increased vigor of growth,survival, and fertility of hybrids as compared with the parental linesthat were used to form the hybrid. Maximum heterosis is usually achievedby crossing two genetically different, highly inbred lines.

Hybrid commercial sweet corn seed can be produced by removing thetassels from the female parent or by using a male sterile femaleincorporating manual or mechanical detasseling. Alternate strips of twosweet corn inbreds are planted in a field, and the pollen-bearingtassels are removed from one of the inbreds (female). Providing there issufficient isolation from sources of foreign corn pollen, the ears ofthe detasseled inbred will be fertilized only from the other inbred(male), and the resulting seed is therefore hybrid and will form hybridplants.

The laborious, and occasionally unreliable, detasseling process can beavoided by using cytoplasmic male-sterile (CMS) inbreds. Plants of a CMSinbred are male sterile as a result of factors resulting from thecytoplasmic, as opposed to the nuclear, genome. Thus, thischaracteristic is inherited exclusively through the female parent incorn plants, since only the female provides cytoplasm. Prior to thefertilized seed. CMS plants are fertilized with pollen from anotherinbred that is not male-sterile. Pollen from the second inbred may ormay not contribute genes that make the hybrid plants male-fertile. Seedfrom detasseled fertile corn and CMS produced seed of the same hybridcan be blended to insure that adequate pollen loads are available forfertilization when the hybrid plants are grown.

There are several methods of conferring genetic male sterilityavailable, such as multiple mutant genes at separate locations withinthe genome that confer male sterility, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.4,654,465 and 4,727,219 to Brar et al. and chromosomal translocations asdescribed by Patterson in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,861,709 and 3,710,511. Theseand all patents referred to are incorporated by reference. In additionto these methods, Albertsen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,068, havedeveloped a system of nuclear male sterility which includes: identifyinga gene which is critical to male fertility, silencing this native genewhich is critical to male fertility; removing the native promoter fromthe essential male fertility gene and replacing it with an induciblepromoter; inserting this genetically engineered gene back into theplant; and thus creating a plant that is male sterile because theinducible promoter is not “on” resulting in the male fertility gene notbeing transcribed. Fertility is restored by inducing, or turning “on”,the promoter, which in turn allows the gene that confers male fertilityto be transcribed.

There are many other methods of conferring genetic male sterility in theart, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. These methods use avariety of approaches such as delivering into the plant a gene encodinga cytotoxic substance associated with a male tissue specific promoter oran anti-sense system in which a gene critical to fertility is identifiedand an antisense to that gene is inserted in the plant (see,Fabinjanski, et al. EPO 89/3010153.8 publication no. 329, 308 and PCTapplication PCT/CA90/00037 published as WO 90/08828).

Another version useful in controlling male sterility makes use ofgametocides. Gametocides are not a genetic system, but rather a topicalapplication of chemicals. These chemicals affect cells that are criticalto male fertility. The application of these chemicals affects fertilityin the plants only for the growing season in which the gametocide isapplied (see Carlson, G. R., U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,904). Application ofthe gametocide, timing of the application and genotype specificallyoften limit the usefulness of the approach.

Once the inbreds that give the best hybrid performance have beenidentified, the hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long asthe homogeneity of the inbred parent is maintained. A single-crosshybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to produce the F1progeny. A double-cross hybrid is produced from four inbred linescrossed in pairs (A×B and C×D) and then the two F1 hybrids are crossedagain (A×B)×(C×D). Much of the hybrid vigor and uniformity exhibited byF1 hybrids is lost in the next generation (F2). Consequently, seed fromF2 hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock.

The production of hybrids is a well-developed industry, involving theisolated production of both the parental lines and the hybrids whichresult from crossing those lines. For a detailed discussion of thehybrid production process, see, e.g., Wright, Commercial Hybrid SeedProduction 8:161-176, In Hybridization of Crop Plants.

v. Bulk Segregation Analysis (BSA)

BSA, a.k.a. bulked segregation analysis, or bulk segregant analysis, isa method described by Michelmore et al. (Michelmore et al., 1991,Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulkedsegregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomicregions by using segregating populations. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, USA, 99:9828-9832) and Quarrie et al. (Quarrie etal., 1999, Journal of Experimental Botany, 50(337):1299-1306).

For BSA of a trait of interest, parental lines with certain differentphenotypes are chosen and crossed to generate F2, doubled haploid orrecombinant inbred populations with QTL analysis. The population is thenphenotyped to identify individual plants or lines having high or lowexpression of the trait. Two DNA bulks are prepared, one from theindividuals having one phenotype (e.g., resistant to virus), and theother from the individuals having reversed phenotype (e.g., susceptibleto virus), and analyzed for allele frequency with molecular markers.Only a few individuals are required in each bulk (e.g., 10 plants each)if the markers are dominant (e.g., RAPDs). More individuals are neededwhen markers are co-dominant (e.g., RFLPs, SNPs or SSRs). Markers linkedto the phenotype can be identified and used for breeding or QTL mapping.

vi. Hand-Pollination Method

Hand pollination describes the crossing of plants via the deliberatefertilization of female ovules with pollen from a desired male parentplant. In some embodiments the donor or recipient female parent and thedonor or recipient male parent line are planted in the same field. Insome embodiments the donor or recipient female parent and the donor orrecipient male parent line are planted in the same green house. Theinbred male parent can be planted earlier or later than the femaleparent to ensure adequate pollen supply at the pollination time. In someembodiments, the male parent and female parent can be planted at a ratioof 1 male parent to 2-6 female parents. The male parent may be plantedat the top of the field for efficient male pollen collection duringpollination. Pollination is started when the female parent flower isready to be fertilized and there is available pollen from the maleparent. Female ear shoots that are ready to open in the following daysare identified, covered with paper cups or small paper bags that preventbee or any other insect from visiting the female flowers, and markedwith any kind of material that can be easily seen the next morning. Themale pollen of the male parent are collected after it is likely thatthere is new pollen available from that days shedding. The coveredfemale flowers of the female parent, which have ear silk showing, areun-covered and pollinated with the collected fresh male pollen of themale parent, starting as soon as the male flower sheds pollen. Thepollinated female flowers are again covered after pollination to preventcontamination by other pollen traveling by wind or by bees and any otherinsects. The pollinated female flowers are also marked. The marked earsare harvested. In some embodiments, the male pollen used forfertilization has been previously collected and stored.

vii. Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes (TILLING)

Breeding schemes of the present application can include crosses withTILLING® plant lines. TILLING® is a method in molecular biology thatallows directed identification of mutations in a specific gene. TILLING®was introduced in 2000, using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana.TILLING® has since been used as a reverse genetics method in otherorganisms such as zebrafish, corn, wheat, rice, soybean, tomato andsweet corn.

The method combines a standard and efficient technique of mutagenesiswith a chemical mutagen (e.g., Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)) with asensitive DNA screening-technique that identifies single base mutations(also called point mutations) in a target gene. EcoTILLING is a methodthat uses TILLING® techniques to look for natural mutations inindividuals, usually for population genetics analysis (see Comai, etal., 2003 The Plant Journal 37, 778-786; Gilchrist et al. 2006 Mol.Ecol. 15, 1367-1378; Mejlhede et al. 2006 Plant Breeding 125, 461-467;Nieto et al. 2007 BMC Plant Biology 7, 34-42, each of which isincorporated by reference hereby for all purposes). DEcoTILLING is amodification of TILLING® and EcoTILLING which uses an inexpensive methodto identify fragments (Garvin et al., 2007, DEco-TILLING: An inexpensivemethod for SNP discovery that reduces ascertainment bias. MolecularEcology Notes 7, 735-746).

The TILLING® method relies on the formation of heteroduplexes that areformed when multiple alleles (which could be from a heterozygote or apool of multiple homozygotes and heterozygotes) are amplified in a PCR,heated, and then slowly cooled. As DNA bases are not pairing at themismatch of the two DNA strands (the induced mutation in TILLING® or thenatural mutation or SNP in EcoTILLING), they provoke a shape change inthe double strand DNA fragment which is then cleaved by single strandednucleases. The products are then separated by size on several differentplatforms.

Several TILLING® centers exists over the world that focus onagriculturally important species: UC Davis (USA), focusing on Rice;Purdue University (USA), focusing on Maize; University of BritishColumbia (CA), focusing on Brassica napus; John Innes Centre (UK),focusing on Brassica rapa; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research, focusing onArabidopsis; Southern Illinois University (USA), focusing on Soybean;John Innes Centre (UK), focusing on Lotus and Medicago; and INRA(France), focusing on Pea and Tomato.

More detailed description on methods and compositions on TILLING® can befound in U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,075, US 2004/0053236 A1, WO 2005/055704,and WO 2005/048692, each of which is hereby incorporated by referencefor all purposes.

Thus, in some embodiments, the breeding methods of the presentdisclosure include breeding with one or more TILLING plant lines withone or more identified mutations.

viii. Mutation Breeding

Mutation breeding is another method of introducing new variation andsubsequent traits into sweet corn plants. Mutations that occurspontaneously or are artificially induced can be useful sources ofvariability for a plant breeder. The goal of artificial mutagenesis isto increase the rate of mutation for a desired characteristic. Mutationrates can be increased by many different means or mutating agentsincluding temperature, long-term seed storage, tissue cultureconditions, radiation (such as X-rays, Gamma rays, neutrons, Betaradiation, or ultraviolet radiation), chemical mutagens (such as baseanalogs like 5-bromo-uracil), antibiotics, alkylating agents (such assulfur mustards, nitrogen mustards, epoxides, ethyleneamines, sulfates,sulfonates, sulfones, or lactones), azide, hydroxylamine, nitrous acidor acridines. Once a desired trait is observed through mutagenesis thetrait may then be incorporated into existing germplasm by traditionalbreeding techniques. Details of mutation breeding can be found in W. R.Fehr, 1993, Principles of Cultivar Development, Macmillan Publishing Co.

New breeding techniques such as the ones involving the uses ofengineered nuclease to enhance the efficacy and precision of geneediting in combination with oligonucleotides including, but not limitedto Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN), TAL effector nucleases (TALENs),chemical nucleases, meganucleases, homing nucleases, and clusteredregularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associatedendonuclease Cas system (using such as Cas9, Cas12a/Cpf1, Cas13/C2c2,CasX and CasY nucleases) shall also be used to generate geneticvariability and introduce new traits into sweet corn varieties.

ix. Double Haploids and Chromosome Doubling

One way to obtain homozygous plants without the need to cross twoparental lines followed by a long selection of the segregating progeny,and/or multiple backcrossing is to produce haploids and then double thechromosomes to form doubled haploids. Haploid plants can occurspontaneously, or may be artificially induced via chemical treatments orby crossing plants with inducer lines (Seymour et al. 2012, PNAS vol.109, pg. 4227-4232; Zhang et al., 2008 Plant Cell Rep. December 27(12)1851-60). The production of haploid progeny can occur via a variety ofmechanisms which can affect the distribution of chromosomes duringgamete formation. The chromosome complements of haploids sometimesdouble spontaneously to produce homozygous doubled haploids (DHs).Mixoploids, which are plants which contain cells having differentploidies, can sometimes arise and may represent plants that areundergoing chromosome doubling so as to spontaneously produce doubledhaploid tissues, organs, shoots, floral parts or plants. Another commontechnique is to induce the formation of double haploid plants with achromosome doubling treatment such as colchicine (El-Hennawy et al.,2011 Vol 56, issue 2 pg. 63-72; Doubled Haploid Production in CropPlants 2003 edited by Maluszynski ISBN 1-4020-1544-5). The production ofdoubled haploid plants yields highly uniform inbred lines and isespecially desirable as an alternative to sexual inbreeding oflonger-generation crops. By producing doubled haploid progeny, thenumber of possible gene combinations for inherited traits is moremanageable. Thus, an efficient doubled haploid technology cansignificantly reduce the time and the cost of inbred and cultivardevelopment.

x. Protoplast Fusion

In another method for breeding plants, protoplast fusion can also beused for the transfer of trait-conferring genomic material from a donorplant to a recipient plant. Protoplast fusion is an induced orspontaneous union, such as a somatic hybridization, between two or moreprotoplasts (cells of which the cell walls are removed by enzymatictreatment) to produce a single bi- or multi-nucleate cell. The fusedcell that may even be obtained with plant species that cannot beinterbred in nature is tissue cultured into a hybrid plant exhibitingthe desirable combination of traits.

xi. Embryo Rescue

Alternatively, embryo rescue may be employed in the transfer ofresistance-conferring genomic material from a donor plant to a recipientplant. Embryo rescue can be used as a procedure to isolate embryos fromcrosses to rapidly move to the next generation of backcrossing orselfing or wherein plants fail to produce viable seed. In this process,the fertilized ovary or immature seed of a plant is tissue cultured tocreate new plants (see Pierik, 1999, In Vitro Culture of Higher Plants,Springer, ISBN 079235267X, 978-0792352679, which is incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety).

Gene Editing/Genome Editing

Gene editing (or Genome editing) technologies. Breeding and selectionschemes of the present disclosure can include crosses with plant linesthat have undergone genome editing. In some embodiments, the breedingand selection methods of the present disclosure are compatible withplants that have been modified using any gene and/or genome editingtool, including, but not limited to: ZFNs, TALENS, CRISPR-Cas, andMeganuclease technologies. In some embodiments, persons having skill inthe art will recognize that the breeding methods of the presentdisclosure are compatible with many other gene editing technologies. Insome embodiments, the present disclosure teaches gene-editingtechnologies can be applied for a single locus conversion, for example,conferring sweet corn plant with herbicide resistance. In someembodiments, the present disclosure teaches that the single locusconversion is an artificially mutated gene or nucleotide sequence thathas been modified through the use of breeding techniques taught herein.

In some embodiments, the breeding and selection methods of the presentdisclosure are compatible with plants that have been modified throughZinc Finger Nucleases. Three variants of the ZFN technology arerecognized in plant breeding (with applications ranging from producingsingle mutations or short deletions/insertions in the case of ZFN-1 and-2 techniques up to targeted introduction of new genes in the case ofthe ZFN-3 technique); 1) ZFN-1: Genes encoding ZFNs are delivered toplant cells without a repair template. The ZFNs bind to the plant DNAand generate site specific double-strand breaks (DSBs). The naturalDNA-repair process (which occurs through nonhomologous end-joining,NHEJ) leads to site specific mutations, in one or only a few base pairs,or to short deletions or insertions; 2) ZFN-2: Genes encoding ZFNs aredelivered to plant cells along with a repair template homologous to thetargeted area, spanning a few kilo base pairs. The ZFNs bind to theplant DNA and generate site-specific DSBs. Natural gene repairmechanisms generate site-specific point mutations e.g. changes to one ora few base pairs through homologous recombination and the copying of therepair template; and 3) ZFN-3: Genes encoding ZFNs are delivered toplant cells along with a stretch of DNA which can be several kilo basepairs long and the ends of which are homologous to the DNA sequencesflanking the cleavage site. As a result, the DNA stretch is insertedinto the plant genome in a site-specific manner.

In some embodiments, the breeding and selection methods of the presentdisclosure are compatible with plants that have been modified throughTranscription activator-like (TAL) effector nucleases (TALENs). TALENsare polypeptides with repeat polypeptide arms capable of recognizing andbinding to specific nucleic acid regions. By engineering the polypeptidearms to recognize selected target sequences, the TAL nucleases can beused to direct double stranded DNA breaks to specific genomic regions.These breaks can then be repaired via recombination to edit, delete,insert, or otherwise modify the DNA of a host organism. In someembodiments, TALENs are used alone for gene editing (e.g., for thedeletion or disruption of a gene). In other embodiments, TALs are usedin conjunction with donor sequences and/or other recombination factorproteins that will assist in the Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)process to replace the targeted DNA region. For more information on theTAL-mediated gene editing compositions and methods of the presentdisclosure, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,440,432; 8,450,471; 8,586,526;8,586,363; 8,592,645; 8,697,853; 8,704,041; 8,921,112; and 8,912,138,each of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety for all purposes.

In some embodiments, the breeding and selection methods of the presentdisclosure are compatible with plants that have been modified throughClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) orCRISPR-associated (Cas) gene editing tools. CRISPR proteins wereoriginally discovered as bacterial adaptive immunity systems whichprotected bacteria against viral and plasmid invasion. There are atleast three main CRISPR system types (Type I, II, and III) and at least10 distinct subtypes (Makarova, K. S., et. al., Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011May 9; 9(6):467-477). Type I and III systems use Cas protein complexesand short guide polynucleotide sequences to target selected DNA regions.Type II systems rely on a single protein (e.g. Cas9) and the targetingguide polynucleotide, where a portion of the 5′ end of a guide sequenceis complementary to a target nucleic acid. For more information on theCRISPR gene editing compositions and methods of the present disclosure,see U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,697,359; 8,889,418; 8,771,945; and 8,871,445, eachof which is hereby incorporated in its entirety for all purposes.

In some embodiments, the breeding and selection methods of the presentdisclosure are compatible with plants that have been modified throughmeganucleases. In some embodiments, meganucleases are engineeredendonucleases capable of targeting selected DNA sequences and inducingDNA breaks. In some embodiments, new meganucleases targeting specificregions are developed through recombinant techniques which combine theDNA binding motifs from various other identified nucleases. In otherembodiments, new meganucleases are created through semi-rationalmutational analysis, which attempts to modify the structure of existingbinding domains to obtain specificity for additional sequences. For moreinformation on the use of meganucleases for genome editing, see Silva etal., 2011 Current Gene Therapy 11 pg 11-27; and Stoddard et al., 2014Mobile DNA 5 pg 7, each of which is hereby incorporated in its entiretyfor all purposes.

Grafting

Grafting is a process that has been used for many years in crops such ascucurbitaceae, but only more recently for some commercial watermelon andtomato production. Grafting may be used to provide a certain level ofresistance to telluric pathogens such as Phytophthora or to certainnematodes. Grafting is therefore intended to prevent contact between theplant or variety to be cultivated and the infested soil. The variety ofinterest used as the graft or scion, optionally an F1 hybrid, is graftedonto the resistant plant used as the rootstock. The resistant rootstockremains healthy and provides, from the soils, the normal supply for thegraft that it isolates from the diseases. In some recent developments,it has also been shown that some rootstocks are also able to improve theagronomic value for the grafted plant and in particular the equilibriumbetween the vegetative and generative development that are alwaysdifficult to balance in sweet corn cultivation.

Breeding Evaluation

Each breeding program can include a periodic, objective evaluation ofthe efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria varydepending on the goal and objectives, but should include gain fromselection per year based on comparisons to an appropriate standard,overall value of the advanced breeding lines, and number of successfulcultivars produced per unit of input (e.g., per year, per dollarexpended, etc.).

Promising advanced breeding lines are thoroughly tested per se and inhybrid combination and compared to appropriate standards in environmentsrepresentative of the commercial target area(s). The best lines arecandidates for use as parents in new commercial cultivars; those stilldeficient in a few traits may be used as parents to produce newpopulations for further selection or in a backcross program to improvethe parent lines for a specific trait.

In some embodiments, the plants are selected on the basis of one or morephenotypic traits. Skilled persons will readily appreciate that suchtraits include any observable characteristic of the plant, including forexample growth rate, vigor, plant health, maturity, tillering,standability or tolerance to lodging, plant height, ear weight, leafarea or orientation, height, weight, color, taste, smell, sugar levels,aroma, changes in the production of one or more compounds by the plant(including for example, metabolites, proteins, drugs, carbohydrates,oils, and any other compounds).

A most difficult task is the identification of individuals that aregenetically superior, because for most traits the true genotypic valueis masked by other confounding plant traits or environmental factors.One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performancerelative to other experimental plants and to a widely grown standardcultivar. If a single observation is inconclusive, replicatedobservations provide a better estimate of its genetic worth.

Proper testing should detect any major faults and establish the level ofsuperiority or improvement over current cultivars. In addition toshowing superior performance, there must be a demand for a new cultivarthat is compatible with industry standards or which creates a newmarket. The introduction of a new cultivar will incur additional coststo the seed producer, the grower, processor and consumer for specialadvertising and marketing, altered seed and commercial productionpractices, and new product utilization. The testing preceding release ofa new cultivar should take into consideration research and developmentcosts as well as technical superiority of the final cultivar. Forseed-propagated cultivars, it must be feasible to produce seed easilyand economically.

It should be appreciated that in certain embodiments, plants may beselected based on the absence, suppression or inhibition of a certainfeature or trait (such as an undesirable feature or trait) as opposed tothe presence of a certain feature or trait (such as a desirable featureor trait).

Selecting plants based on genotypic information is also envisaged (forexample, including the pattern of plant gene expression, genotype, orpresence of genetic markers). Where the presence of one or more geneticmarker is assessed, the one or more marker may already be known and/orassociated with a particular characteristic of a plant; for example, amarker or markers may be associated with an increased growth rate ormetabolite profile. This information could be used in combination withassessment based on other characteristics in a method of the disclosureto select for a combination of different plant characteristics that maybe desirable. Such techniques may be used to identify novel quantitativetrait loci (QTLs). By way of example, plants may be selected based ongrowth rate, size (including but not limited to weight, height, leafsize, stem size, branching pattern, or the size of any part of theplant), general health, survival, tolerance to adverse physicalenvironments and/or any other characteristic, as described hereinbefore.

Further non-limiting examples include selecting plants based on: speedof seed germination; quantity of biomass produced; increased root,and/or leaf/shoot growth that leads to an increased yield (herbage orgrain or fiber or oil) or biomass production; effects on plant growththat results in an increased seed yield for a crop; effects on plantgrowth which result in an increased yield; effects on plant growth thatlead to an increased resistance or tolerance to disease includingfungal, viral or bacterial diseases, to mycoplasma, or to pests such asinsects, mites or nematodes in which damage is measured by decreasedfoliar symptoms such as the incidence of bacterial or fungal lesions, orarea of damaged foliage or reduction in the numbers of nematode cysts orgalls on plant roots, or improvements in plant yield in the presence ofsuch plant pests and diseases; effects on plant growth that lead toincreased metabolite yields; effects on plant growth that lead toimproved aesthetic appeal which may be particularly important in plantsgrown for their form, color or taste, for example the color intensity ofsweet corn exocarp (skin) of said kernel.

Molecular Breeding Evaluation Techniques

Selection of plants based on phenotypic or genotypic information may beperformed using techniques such as, but not limited to: high through-putscreening of chemical components of plant origin, sequencing techniquesincluding high through-put sequencing of genetic material, differentialdisplay techniques (including DDRT-PCR, and DD-PCR), nucleic acidmicroarray techniques, RNA-seq (Transcriptome Sequencing), qRTPCR(quantitative real time PCR).

In one embodiment, the evaluating step of a plant breeding programinvolves the identification of desirable traits in progeny plants.Progeny plants can be grown in, or exposed to conditions designed toemphasize a particular trait (e.g. drought conditions for droughttolerance, lower temperatures for freezing tolerant traits). Progenyplants with the highest scores for a particular trait may be used forsubsequent breeding steps.

In some embodiments, plants selected from the evaluation step canexhibit a 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%,65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%, 120% or more improvement in aparticular plant trait compared to a control plant.

In other embodiments, the evaluating step of plant breeding comprisesone or more molecular biological tests for genes or other markers. Forexample, the molecular biological test can involve probe hybridizationand/or amplification of nucleic acid (e.g., measuring nucleic aciddensity by Northern or Southern hybridization, PCR) and/or immunologicaldetection (e.g., measuring protein density, such as precipitation andagglutination tests, ELISA (e.g., Lateral Flow test or DAS-ELISA),Western blot, Radioimmune Assay (RIA), immune labeling, immunosorbentelectron microscopy (ISEM), and/or dot blot).

The procedure to perform a nucleic acid hybridization, an amplificationof nucleic acid (e.g., PCR, RT-PCR) or an immunological detection (e.g.,precipitation and agglutination tests, ELISA (e.g., Lateral Flow test orDAS-ELISA), Western blot, RIA, immunogold or immunofluorescent labeling,immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM), and/or dot blot tests) areperformed as described elsewhere herein and well-known by one skilled inthe art.

In one embodiment, the evaluating step comprises PCR (semi-quantitativeor quantitative), wherein primers are used to amplify one or morenucleic acid sequences of a desirable gene, or a nucleic acid associatedwith said gene, or QTL or a desirable trait (e.g., a co-segregatingnucleic acid, or other marker).

In another embodiment, the evaluating step comprises immunologicaldetection (e.g., precipitation and agglutination tests, ELISA (e.g.,Lateral Flow test or DAS-ELISA), Western blot, RIA, immuno labeling(gold, fluorescent, or other detectable marker), immunosorbent electronmicroscopy (ISEM), and/or dot blot), wherein one or more gene ormarker-specific antibodies are used to detect one or more desirableproteins. In one embodiment, said specific antibody is selected from thegroup consisting of polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies,antibody fragments, and combination thereof.

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) can be utilizedin the present disclosure to determine expression of a gene to assistduring the selection step of a breeding scheme. It is a variant ofpolymerase chain reaction (PCR), a laboratory technique commonly used inmolecular biology to generate many copies of a DNA sequence, a processtermed “amplification”. In RT-PCR, however, RNA strand is first reversetranscribed into its DNA complement (complementary DNA, or cDNA) usingthe enzyme reverse transcriptase, and the resulting cDNA is amplifiedusing traditional or real-time PCR.

RT-PCR utilizes a pair of primers, which are complementary to a definedsequence on each of the two strands of the cDNA. These primers are thenextended by a DNA polymerase and a copy of the strand is made after eachcycle, leading to logarithmic amplification.

RT-PCR includes three major steps. The first step is the reversetranscription (RT) where RNA is reverse transcribed to cDNA using areverse transcriptase and primers. This step is very important in orderto allow the performance of PCR since DNA polymerase can act only on DNAtemplates. The RT step can be performed either in the same tube with PCR(one-step PCR) or in a separate one (two-step PCR) using a temperaturebetween 40° C. and 60° C., depending on the properties of the reversetranscriptase used.

The next step involves the denaturation of the dsDNA at 95° C., so thatthe two strands separate and the primers can bind again at lowertemperatures and begin a new chain reaction. Then, the temperature isdecreased until it reaches the annealing temperature which can varydepending on the set of primers used, their concentration, the probe andits concentration (if used), and the cations concentration. The mainconsideration, of course, when choosing the optimal annealingtemperature is the melting temperature (Tm) of the primers and probes(if used). The annealing temperature chosen for a PCR depends directlyon length and composition of the primers. This is the result of thedifference of hydrogen bonds between A-T (2 bonds) and G-C (3 bonds). Anannealing temperature about 5 degrees below the lowest Tm of the pair ofprimers is usually used.

The final step of PCR amplification is the DNA extension from theprimers which is done by the thermostable Taq DNA polymerase usually at72° C., which is the optimal temperature for the polymerase to work. Thelength of the incubation at each temperature, the temperaturealterations and the number of cycles are controlled by a programmablethermal cycler. The analysis of the PCR products depends on the type ofPCR applied. If a conventional PCR is used, the PCR product is detectedusing for example agarose gel electrophoresis or other polymer gel likepolyacrylamide gels and ethidium bromide (or other nucleic acidstaining).

Conventional RT-PCR is a time-consuming technique with importantlimitations when compared to real time PCR techniques. This combinedwith the fact that ethidium bromide has low sensitivity, yields resultsthat are not always reliable. Moreover, there is an increasedcross-contamination risk of the samples since detection of the PCRproduct requires the post-amplification processing of the samples.Furthermore, the specificity of the assay is mainly determined by theprimers, which can give false-positive results. However, the mostimportant issue concerning conventional RT-PCR is the fact that it is asemi or even a low quantitative technique, where the amplicon can bevisualized only after the amplification ends.

Real time RT-PCR provides a method where the amplicons can be visualizedas the amplification progresses using a fluorescent reporter molecule.There are three major kinds of fluorescent reporters used in real timeRT-PCR, general nonspecific DNA Binding Dyes such as SYBR Green I,TaqMan Probes and Molecular Beacons (including Scorpions).

For example, the real time PCR thermal cycler has a fluorescencedetection threshold, below which it cannot discriminate the differencebetween amplification generated signal and background noise. On theother hand, the fluorescence increases as the amplification progressesand the instrument performs data acquisition during the annealing stepof each cycle. The number of amplicons will reach the detection baselineafter a specific cycle, which depends on the initial concentration ofthe target DNA sequence. The cycle at which the instrument candiscriminate the amplification generated fluorescence from thebackground noise is called the threshold cycle (Ct). The higher is theinitial DNA concentration, the lower its Ct will be.

Other forms of nucleic acid detection can include next generationsequencing methods such as DNA SEQ or RNA SEQ using any known sequencingplatform including, but not limited to: Roche 454, Solexa GenomeAnalyzer, AB SOLiD, Illumina GA/HiSeq, Ion PGM, MiSeq, among others (Liuet al., 2012 Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology Volume 2012 ID251364; Franca et al., 2002 Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 35 pg.169-200; Mardis 2008 Genomics and Human Genetics vol. 9 pg. 387-402).

In other embodiments, nucleic acids may be detected with other highthroughput hybridization technologies including microarrays, gene chips,LNA probes, nanoStrings, and fluorescence polarization detection amongothers.

In some embodiments, detection of markers can be achieved at an earlystage of plant growth by harvesting a small tissue sample (e.g., branch,or leaf disk). This approach is preferable when working with largepopulations as it allows breeders to weed out undesirable progeny at anearly stage and conserve growth space and resources for progeny whichshow more promise. In some embodiments the detection of markers isautomated, such that the detection and storage of marker data is handledby a machine. Recent advances in robotics have also led to full serviceanalysis tools capable of handling nucleic acid/protein markerextractions, detection, storage and analysis.

Quantitative Trait Loci

Breeding schemes of the present application can include crosses betweendonor and recipient plants. In some embodiments, said donor plantscontain a gene or genes of interest which may confer the plant with adesirable phenotype. The recipient line can be an elite line havingcertain favorable traits for commercial production. In one embodiment,the elite line may contain other genes that also impart said line withthe desired phenotype. When crossed together, the donor and recipientplant may create a progeny plant with combined desirable loci which mayprovide quantitatively additive effect of a particular characteristic.In that case, QTL mapping can be involved to facilitate the breedingprocess.

A QTL (quantitative trait locus) mapping can be applied to determine theparts of the donor plant's genome conferring the desirable phenotype,and facilitate the breeding methods. Inheritance of quantitative traitsor polygenic inheritance refers to the inheritance of a phenotypiccharacteristic that varies in degree and can be attributed to theinteractions between two or more genes and their environment. Though notnecessarily genes themselves, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) arestretches of DNA that are closely linked to the genes that underlie thetrait in question. QTLs can be molecularly identified to help mapregions of the genome that contain genes involved in specifying aquantitative trait. This can be an early step in identifying andsequencing these genes.

Typically, QTLs underlie continuous traits (those traits that varycontinuously, e.g. yield, height, level of resistance to virus, etc.) asopposed to discrete traits (traits that have two or several charactervalues, e.g. smooth vs. wrinkled peas used by Mendel in hisexperiments). Moreover, a single phenotypic trait is usually determinedby many genes. Consequently, many QTLs are associated with a singletrait.

A quantitative trait locus (QTL) is a region of DNA that is associatedwith a particular phenotypic trait. Knowing the number of QTLs thatexplains variation in the phenotypic trait tells about the geneticarchitecture of a trait. It may tell that a trait is controlled by manygenes of small effect, or by a few genes of large effect or by a severalgenes of small effect and few genes of larger effect.

Another use of QTLs is to identify candidate genes underlying a trait.Once a region of DNA is identified as contributing to a phenotype, itcan be sequenced. The DNA sequence of any genes in this region can thenbe compared to a database of DNA for genes whose function is alreadyknown.

In a recent development, classical QTL analyses are combined with geneexpression profiling i.e. by DNA microarrays. Such expression QTLs(e-QTLs) describes cis- and trans-controlling elements for theexpression of often disease-associated genes. Observed epistatic effectshave been found beneficial to identify the gene responsible by across-validation of genes within the interacting loci with metabolicpathway and scientific literature databases.

QTL mapping is the statistical study of the alleles that occur in alocus and the phenotypes (physical forms or traits) that they produce(see, Meksem and Kahl, The handbook of plant genome mapping: genetic andphysical mapping, 2005, Wiley-VCH, ISBN 3527311165, 9783527311163).Because most traits of interest are governed by more than one gene,defining and studying the entire locus of genes related to a trait giveshope of understanding what effect the genotype of an individual mighthave in the real world.

Statistical analysis is required to demonstrate that different genesinteract with one another and to determine whether they produce asignificant effect on the phenotype. QTLs identify a particular regionof the genome as containing one or several genes, i.e. a cluster ofgenes that is associated with the trait being assayed or measured. Theyare shown as intervals across a chromosome, where the probability ofassociation is plotted for each marker used in the mapping experiment.

To begin, a set of genetic markers must be developed for the species inquestion. A marker is an identifiable region of variable DNA. Biologistsare interested in understanding the genetic basis of phenotypes(physical traits). The aim is to find a marker that is significantlymore likely to co-occur with the trait than expected by chance, that is,a marker that has a statistical association with the trait. Ideally,they would be able to find the specific gene or genes in question, butthis is a long and difficult undertaking. Instead, they can more readilyfind regions of DNA that are very close to the genes in question. When aQTL is found, it is often not the actual gene underlying the phenotypictrait, but rather a region of DNA that is closely linked with the gene.

For organisms whose genomes are known, one might now try to excludegenes in the identified region whose function is known with somecertainty not to be connected with the trait in question. If the genomeis not available, it may be an option to sequence the identified regionand determine the putative functions of genes by their similarity togenes with known function, usually in other genomes. This can be doneusing BLAST, an online tool that allows users to enter a primarysequence and search for similar sequences within the BLAST database ofgenes from various organisms.

Another interest of statistical geneticists using QTL mapping is todetermine the complexity of the genetic architecture underlying aphenotypic trait. For example, they may be interested in knowing whethera phenotype is shaped by many independent loci, or by a few loci, andhow those loci interact. This can provide information on how thephenotype may be evolving.

Molecular markers are used for the visualization of differences innucleic acid sequences. This visualization is possible due to DNA-DNAhybridization techniques (RFLP) and/or due to techniques using thepolymerase chain reaction (e.g. STS, SNPs, microsatellites, AFLP). Alldifferences between two parental genotypes will segregate in a mappingpopulation based on the cross of these parental genotypes. Thesegregation of the different markers may be compared and recombinationfrequencies can be calculated. The recombination frequencies ofmolecular markers on different chromosomes are generally 50%. Betweenmolecular markers located on the same chromosome the recombinationfrequency depends on the distance between the markers. A lowrecombination frequency usually corresponds to a low distance betweenmarkers on a chromosome. Comparing all recombination frequencies willresult in the most logical order of the molecular markers on thechromosomes. This most logical order can be depicted in a linkage map(Paterson, 1996, Genome Mapping in Plants. R. G. Landes, Austin.). Agroup of adjacent or contiguous markers on the linkage map that isassociated to a reduced disease incidence and/or a reduced lesion growthrate pinpoints the position of a QTL.

The nucleic acid sequence of a QTL may be determined by methods known tothe skilled person. For instance, a nucleic acid sequence comprisingsaid QTL or a resistance-conferring part thereof may be isolated from adonor plant by fragmenting the genome of said plant and selecting thosefragments harboring one or more markers indicative of said QTL.Subsequently, or alternatively, the marker sequences (or parts thereof)indicative of said QTL may be used as (PCR) amplification primers, inorder to amplify a nucleic acid sequence comprising said QTL from agenomic nucleic acid sample or a genome fragment obtained from saidplant. The amplified sequence may then be purified in order to obtainthe isolated QTL. The nucleotide sequence of the QTL, and/or of anyadditional markers comprised therein, may then be obtained by standardsequencing methods.

One or more such QTLs associated with a desirable trait in a donor plantcan be transferred to a recipient plant to incorporate the desirabletrait into progeny plants by transferring and/or breeding methods.

In one embodiment, an advanced backcross QTL analysis (AB-QTL) is usedto discover the nucleotide sequence or the QTLs responsible for theresistance of a plant. Such method was proposed by Tanksley and Nelsonin 1996 (Tanksley and Nelson, 1996, Advanced backcross QTL analysis: amethod for simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTL fromun-adapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet92:191-203) as a new breeding method that integrates the process of QTLdiscovery with variety development, by simultaneously identifying andtransferring useful QTL alleles from un-adapted (e.g., land races, wildspecies) to elite germplasm, thus broadening the genetic diversityavailable for breeding. AB-QTL strategy was initially developed andtested in tomato, and has been adapted for use in other crops includingrice, maize, wheat, pepper, barley, and bean. Once favorable QTL allelesare detected, only a few additional marker-assisted generations arerequired to generate near isogenic lines (NILs) or introgression lines(ILs) that can be field tested in order to confirm the QTL effect andsubsequently used for variety development.

Isogenic lines in which favorable QTL alleles have been fixed can begenerated by systematic backcrossing and introgressing of marker-defineddonor segments in the recurrent parent background. These isogenic linesare referred to as near isogenic lines (NILs), introgression lines(ILs), backcross inbred lines (BILs), backcross recombinant inbred lines(BCRIL), recombinant chromosome substitution lines (RCSLs), chromosomesegment substitution lines (CSSLs), and stepped aligned inbredrecombinant strains (STAIRSs). An introgression line in plant molecularbiology is a line of a crop species that contains genetic materialderived from a similar species. ILs represent NILs with relatively largeaverage introgression length, while BILs and BCRILs are backcrosspopulations generally containing multiple donor introgressions per line.As used herein, the term “introgression lines or ILs” refers to plantlines containing a single marker defined homozygous donor segment, andthe term “pre-ILs” refers to lines which still contain multiplehomozygous and/or heterozygous donor segments.

To enhance the rate of progress of introgression breeding, a geneticinfrastructure of exotic libraries can be developed. Such an exoticlibrary comprises a set of introgression lines, each of which has asingle, possibly homozygous, marker-defined chromosomal segment thatoriginates from a donor exotic parent, in an otherwise homogenous elitegenetic background, so that the entire donor genome would be representedin a set of introgression lines. A collection of such introgressionlines is referred as libraries of introgression lines or IL libraries(ILLs). The lines of an ILL cover usually the complete genome of thedonor, or the part of interest. Introgression lines allow the study ofquantitative trait loci, but also the creation of new varieties byintroducing exotic traits. High resolution mapping of QTL using ILLsenable breeders to assess whether the effect on the phenotype is due toa single QTL or to several tightly linked QTL affecting the same trait.In addition, sub-ILs can be developed to discover molecular markerswhich are more tightly linked to the QTL of interest, which can be usedfor marker-assisted breeding (MAB). Multiple introgression lines can bedeveloped when the introgression of a single QTL is not sufficient toresult in a substantial improvement in agriculturally important traits(Gur and Zamir, Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers inplant breeding, 2004, PLoS Biol.; 2(10):e245).

Plant Transformation

Sweet corn plants of the present disclosure, such as ‘COACHMAN’ can befurther modified by introducing one or more transgenes which whenexpressed lead to desired phenotypes. The most common method for theintroduction of new genetic material into a plant genome involves theuse of living cells of the bacterial pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciensto literally inject a piece of DNA, called transfer or T-DNA, intoindividual plant cells (usually following wounding of the tissue) whereit is targeted to the plant nucleus for chromosomal integration. Thereare numerous patents governing Agrobacterium mediated transformation andparticular DNA delivery plasmids designed specifically for use withAgrobacterium—for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,475, EP0265556,EP0270822, WO8504899, WO8603516, U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616, EP0604662,EP0672752, WO8603776, WO9209696, WO9419930, WO9967357, U.S. Pat. No.4,399,216, WO8303259, U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,179, EP068730, WO9516031, U.S.Pat. Nos. 5,693,512, 6,051,757 and EP904362A1. Agrobacterium-mediatedplant transformation involves as a first step the placement of DNAfragments cloned on plasmids into living Agrobacterium cells, which arethen subsequently used for transformation into individual plant cells.Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation is thus an indirect planttransformation method. Methods of Agrobacterium-mediated planttransformation that involve using vectors with no T-DNA are also wellknown to those skilled in the art and can have applicability in thepresent disclosure. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,250,554, whichutilizes P-DNA instead of T-DNA in the transformation vector.

Direct plant transformation methods using DNA have also been reported.The first of these to be reported historically is electroporation, whichutilizes an electrical current applied to a solution containing plantcells (M. E. Fromm et al., Nature, 319, 791 (1986); H. Jones et al.,Plant Mol. Biol., 13, 501 (1989) and H. Yang et al., Plant Cell Reports,7, 421 (1988). Another direct method, called “biolistic bombardment”,uses ultrafine particles, usually tungsten or gold, that are coated withDNA and then sprayed onto the surface of a plant tissue with sufficientforce to cause the particles to penetrate plant cells, including thethick cell wall, membrane and nuclear envelope, but without killing atleast some of them (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,204,253, 5,015,580). A third directmethod uses fibrous forms of metal or ceramic consisting of sharp,porous or hollow needle-like projections that literally impale thecells, and also the nuclear envelope of cells. Both silicon carbide andaluminum borate whiskers have been used for plant transformation (Mizunoet al., 2004; Petolino et al., 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,523 USApplication 20040197909) and also for bacterial and animaltransformation (Kaepler et al., 1992; Raloff, 1990; Wang, 1995). Thereare other methods reported, and undoubtedly, additional methods will bedeveloped. However, the efficiencies of each of these indirect or directmethods in introducing foreign DNA into plant cells are invariablyextremely low, making it necessary to use some method for selection ofonly those cells that have been transformed, and further, allowinggrowth and regeneration into plants of only those cells that have beentransformed.

For efficient plant transformation, a selection method must be employedsuch that whole plants are regenerated from a single transformed celland every cell of the transformed plant carries the DNA of interest.These methods can employ positive selection, whereby a foreign gene issupplied to a plant cell that allows it to utilize a substrate presentin the medium that it otherwise could not use, such as mannose or xylose(for example, refer U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,767,378; 5,994,629). Moretypically, however, negative selection is used because it is moreefficient, utilizing selective agents such as herbicides or antibioticsthat either kill or inhibit the growth of nontransformed plant cells andreducing the possibility of chimeras. Resistance genes that areeffective against negative selective agents are provided on theintroduced foreign DNA used for the plant transformation. For example,one of the most popular selective agents used is the antibiotickanamycin, together with the resistance gene neomycin phosphotransferase(nptII), which confers resistance to kanamycin and related antibiotics(see, for example, Messing & Vierra, Gene 19: 259-268 (1982); Bevan etal., Nature 304:184-187 (1983)). However, many different antibiotics andantibiotic resistance genes can be used for transformation purposes(U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,322, 6,174,724 and 6,255,560). In addition,several herbicides and herbicide resistance genes have been used fortransformation purposes, including the bar gene, which confersresistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin (White et al., Nucl AcidsRes 18: 1062 (1990), Spencer et al., Theor Appl Genet 79: 625-631(1990),U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,795,855, 5,378,824 and 6,107,549). In addition, thedhfr gene, which confers resistance to the anticancer agentmethotrexate, has been used for selection (Bourouis et al., EMBO J.2(7): 1099-1104 (1983).

Genes can be introduced in a site directed fashion using homologousrecombination. Homologous recombination permits site specificmodifications in endogenous genes and thus inherited or acquiredmutations may be corrected, and/or novel alterations may be engineeredinto the genome. Homologous recombination and site-directed integrationin plants are discussed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,451,513,5,501,967 and 5,527,695.

Methods of producing transgenic plants are well known to those ofordinary skill in the art. Transgenic plants can now be produced by avariety of different transformation methods including, but not limitedto, electroporation; microinjection; microprojectile bombardment, alsoknown as particle acceleration or biolistic bombardment; viral-mediatedtransformation; and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. See, forexample, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,405,765; 5,538,877; 5,538,880; 5,550,318;5,641,664; and 5,736,369; and International Patent ApplicationPublication Nos. WO/2002/038779 and WO/2009/117555; Lu et al., (PlantCell Reports, 2008, 27:273-278); Watson et al., Recombinant DNA,Scientific American Books (1992); Hinchee et al., Bio/Tech. 6:915-922(1988); McCabe et al., Bio/Tech. 6:923-926 (1988); Toriyama et al.,Bio/Tech. 6:1072-1074 (1988); Fromm et al., Bio/Tech. 8:833-839 (1990);Mullins et al., Bio/Tech. 8:833-839 (1990); Hiei et al., Plant MolecularBiology 35:205-218 (1997); Ishida et al., Nature Biotechnology14:745-750 (1996); Zhang et al., Molecular Biotechnology 8:223-231(1997); Ku et al., Nature Biotechnology 17:76-80 (1999); and, Raineri etal., Bio/Tech. 8:33-38 (1990)), each of which is expressly incorporatedherein by reference in their entirety.

Microprojectile bombardment is also known as particle acceleration,biolistic bombardment, and the gene gun (Biolistic® Gene Gun). The genegun is used to shoot pellets that are coated with genes (e.g., fordesired traits) into plant seeds or plant tissues in order to get theplant cells to then express the new genes. The gene gun uses an actualexplosive (.22 caliber blank) to propel the material. Compressed air orsteam may also be used as the propellant. The Biolistic® Gene Gun wasinvented in 1983-1984 at Cornell University by John Sanford, EdwardWolf, and Nelson Allen. It and its registered trademark are now owned byE. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. Most species of plants have beentransformed using this method.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a naturally occurring bacterium that iscapable of inserting its DNA (genetic information) into plants,resulting in a type of injury to the plant known as crown gall. Mostspecies of plants can now be transformed using this method, includingcucurbitaceous species. A transgenic plant formed using Agrobacteriumtransformation methods typically contains a single gene on onechromosome, although multiple copies are possible. Such transgenicplants can be referred to as being hemizygous for the added gene. A moreaccurate name for such a plant is an independent segregant, because eachtransformed plant represents a unique T-DNA integration event (U.S. Pat.No. 6,156,953). A transgene locus is generally characterized by thepresence and/or absence of the transgene. A heterozygous genotype inwhich one allele corresponds to the absence of the transgene is alsodesignated hemizygous (U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,437).

General genetic transformation methods, and specific methods fortransforming certain plant species (e.g., maize) are described in U.S.Pat. Nos. 4,940,838, 5,464,763, 5,149,645, 5,501,967, 6,265,638,4,693,976, 5,635,381, 5,731,179, 5,693,512, 6,162,965, 5,693,512,5,981,840, 6,420,630, 6,919,494, 6,329,571, 6,215,051, 6,369,298,5,169,770, 5,376,543, 5,416,011, 5,569,834, 5,824,877, 5,959,179,5,563,055, and 5,968,830, each of which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety for all purposes.

In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides transformed sweetcorn plants or parts thereof that have been transformed so that itsgenetic material contains one or more transgenes, preferably operablylinked to one or more regulatory elements. Also, the disclosure providesmethods for producing a sweet corn plant containing in its geneticmaterial one or more transgenes, preferably operably linked to one ormore regulatory elements, by crossing transformed sweet corn plants witha second plant of another sweet corn, so that the genetic material ofthe progeny that results from the cross contains the transgene(s),preferably operably linked to one or more regulatory elements. Thedisclosure also provides methods for producing a sweet corn plant thatcontains in its genetic material one or more transgene(s), wherein themethod comprises crossing a sweet corn with a second plant of anothersweet corn which contains one or more transgene(s) operably linked toone or more regulatory element(s) so that the genetic material of theprogeny that results from the cross contains the transgene(s) operablylinked to one or more regulatory element(s). Transgenic sweet cornplants, or parts thereof produced by the method are in the scope of thepresent disclosure.

With the advent of molecular biological techniques that have allowed theisolation and characterization of genes that encode specific proteinproducts, scientists in the field of plant biology developed a stronginterest in engineering the genome of plants to contain and expressforeign genes, or additional, or modified versions of native, orendogenous, genes (perhaps driven by different promoters) in order toalter the traits of a plant in a specific manner. Such foreignadditional and/or modified genes are referred to herein collectively as“transgenes.” Over the last fifteen to twenty years several methods forproducing transgenic plants have been developed, and the presentdisclosure, in particular embodiments, also relates to transformedversions of the claimed sweet corn hybrid plant.

Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, includingbiological and physical, plant transformation protocols. See, forexample, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA intoPlants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, GlickB. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages67-88. In addition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods forplant cell or tissue transformation and regeneration of plants areavailable. See, for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for PlantTransformation” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology,Glick B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993)pages 89-119.

i. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

One method for introducing an expression vector into plants is based onthe natural transformation system of Agrobacterium. See, for example,Horsch et al., Science 227:1229 (1985), Jefferson et al., Embo J.3901-390764, (1987), Diant, et al., Molecular Breeding, 3:1, 75-86(1997), Valles et al., PI. Cell. Rep. 145-148:13 (1984). A. tumefaciensand A. rhizogenes are plant pathogenic soil bacteria which geneticallytransform plant cells. The Ti and Ri plasmids of A. tumefaciens and A.rhizogenes, respectively, carry genes responsible for genetictransformation of the plant. See, for example, Kado, C. I., Crit. Rev.Plant Sci. 10:1 (1991). Descriptions of Agrobacterium vector systems andmethods for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer are provided by Gruberet al., supra, Miki et al., supra, and Moloney et al., Plant CellReports 8:238 (1989). See also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan. 7,1997.

ii. Direct Gene Transfer

Despite the fact the host range for Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation is broad, some major cereal crop species and gymnospermshave generally been recalcitrant to this mode of gene transfer, eventhough some success has been achieved in rice and corn. Hiei et al., ThePlant Journal 6:271-282 (1994) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan.7, 1997. Several methods of plant transformation, collectively referredto as direct gene transfer, have been developed as an alternative toAgrobacterium-mediated transformation.

A generally applicable method of plant transformation ismicroprojectile-mediated transformation wherein DNA is carried on thesurface of microprojectiles measuring 1 to 4 micron. The expressionvector is introduced into plant tissues with a biolistic device thataccelerates the microprojectiles to speeds of 300 to 600 m/s which issufficient to penetrate plant cell walls and membranes. Russell, D. R.,et al., Pl. Cell. Rep., 12, 165-169 (1993); Aragao, F. J. L., et al.,Plant Mol. Biol., 20, 357-359 (1992); Aragao, Theor. Appl. Genet.,93:142-150 (1996); Kim, J.; Minamikawa, T., Plant Science, 117:131-138(1996); Sanford et al., Part. Sci. Technol. 5:27 (1987), Sanford, J. C.,Trends Biotech. 6:299 (1988), Klein et al., BioTechnology 6:559-563(1988), Sanford, J. C., Physiol Plant 7:206 (1990), Klein et al.,BioTechnology 10:268 (1992). Gray et al., Plant Cell Tissue and OrganCulture. 1994, 37:2, 179-184.

Another method for physical delivery of DNA to plants is sonication oftarget cells. Zhang et al., BioTechnology 9:996 (1991). Alternatively,liposome and spheroplast fusion have been used to introduce expressionvectors into plants. Deshayes et al., EMBO 1, 4:2731 (1985), Christou etal., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:3962 (1987). Direct uptake of DNAinto protoplasts using CaCl₂ precipitation, polyvinyl alcohol orpoly-L-ornithine has also been reported. Hain et al., Mol. Gen. Genet.199:161 (1985) and Draper et al., Plant Cell Physiol. 23:451 (1982).Electroporation of protoplasts and whole cells and tissues have alsobeen described. D'Halluin et al., Plant Cell 4:1495-1505 (1992) andSpencer et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 24:51-61 (1994).

Any DNA sequence(s), whether from a different species or from the samespecies that is inserted into the genome using transformation isreferred to herein collectively as “transgenes”. In some embodiments ofthe disclosure, a transformed variant of sweet corn hybrid may containat least one transgene but could contain at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, or 10 transgenes. In another embodiment of the disclosure, atransformed variant of another sweet corn plant used as the donor linemay contain at least one transgene but could contain at least 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 transgenes.

Following transformation of sweet corn target tissues, expression of theabove-described selectable marker genes allows for preferentialselection of transformed cells, tissues and/or plants, usingregeneration and selection methods now well known in the art.

The foregoing methods for transformation would typically be used forproducing a transgenic inbred line or a transgenic hybrid plant. Thetransgenic inbred line could then be crossed, with another(non-transformed or transformed) inbred line, in order to produce a newtransgenic inbred line or plant. Alternatively, a genetic trait whichhas been engineered into a particular sweet corn plant using theforegoing transformation techniques could be moved into another sweetcorn plant using traditional backcrossing techniques that are well knownin the plant breeding arts. For example, a backcrossing approach couldbe used to move an engineered trait from a public, non-elite inbred lineinto an elite inbred line, or from an inbred line containing a foreigngene in its genome into an inbred line or lines which do not containthat gene. As used herein, “crossing” can refer to a simple X by Ycross, or the process of backcrossing, depending on the context.

iii. Selection

For efficient plant transformation, a selection method must be employedsuch that whole plants are regenerated from a single transformed celland every cell of the transformed plant carries the DNA of interest.These methods can employ positive selection, whereby a foreign gene issupplied to a plant cell that allows it to utilize a substrate presentin the medium that it otherwise could not use, such as mannose or xylose(for example, refer U.S. Pat. No. 5,767,378; 5,994,629). More typically,however, negative selection is used because it is more efficient,utilizing selective agents such as herbicides or antibiotics that eitherkill or inhibit the growth of non-transformed plant cells and reducingthe possibility of chimeras. Resistance genes that are effective againstnegative selective agents are provided on the introduced foreign DNAused for the plant transformation. For example, one of the most popularselective agents used is the antibiotic kanamycin, together with theresistance gene neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII), which confersresistance to kanamycin and related antibiotics (see, for example,Messing & Vierra, Gene 19: 259-268 (1982); Bevan et al., Nature304:184-187 (1983)). However, many different antibiotics and antibioticresistance genes can be used for transformation purposes (refer U.S.Pat. Nos. 5,034,322, 6,174,724 and 6,255,560). In addition, severalherbicides and herbicide resistance genes have been used fortransformation purposes, including the bar gene, which confersresistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin (White et al., Nucl AcidsRes 18: 1062 (1990), Spencer et al., Theor Appl Genet 79: 625-631(1990),U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,795,855, 5,378,824 and 6,107,549). In addition, thedhfr gene, which confers resistance to the anticancer agentmethotrexate, has been used for selection (Bourouis et al., EMBO J.2(7): 1099-1104 (1983).

Additional selectable marker genes of bacterial origin that conferresistance to antibiotics include gentamycin acetyl transferase,streptomycin phosphotransferase, and aminoglycoside-3′-adenyltransferase, the bleomycin resistance determinant. Hayford et al., PlantPhysiol. 86:1216 (1988), Jones et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 210:86 (1987),Svab et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 14:197 (1990), Hille et al., Plant Mol.Biol. 7:171 (1986). Other selectable marker genes confer resistance toherbicides such as glyphosate, glufosinate or bromoxynil. Comai et al.,Nature 317:741-744 (1985), Gordon-Kamm et al., Plant Cell 2:603-618(1990) and Stalker et al., Science 242:419-423 (1988).

Other selectable marker genes for plant transformation are not ofbacterial origin. These genes include, for example, mouse dihydrofolatereductase, plant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase and plantacetolactate synthase. Eichholtz et al., Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 13:67(1987), Shah et al., Science 233:478 (1986), Charest et al., Plant CellRep. 8:643 (1990).

Another class of marker genes for plant transformation requiresscreening of presumptively transformed plant cells rather than directgenetic selection of transformed cells for resistance to a toxicsubstance such as an antibiotic. These genes are particularly useful toquantify or visualize the spatial pattern of expression of a gene inspecific tissues and are frequently referred to as reporter genesbecause they can be fused to a gene or gene regulatory sequence for theinvestigation of gene expression. Commonly used genes for screeningpresumptively transformed cells include beta-glucuronidase (GUS,beta-galactosidase, luciferase and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.Jefferson, R. A., Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5:387 (1987), Teen et al., EMBOJ. 8:343 (1989), Koncz et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 84:131(1987), DeBlock et al., EMBO J. 3:1681 (1984), Valles et al., Plant CellReport 3:3-4 145-148 (1994), Shetty et al., FoodBiotechnology 11:2111-128 (1997)

In vivo methods for visualizing GUS activity that do not requiredestruction of plant tissue are also available. However, these in vivomethods for visualizing GUS activity have not proven useful for recoveryof transformed cells because of low sensitivity, high fluorescentbackgrounds and limitations associated with the use of luciferase genesas selectable markers.

A gene encoding Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) has been utilized as amarker for gene expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Chalfieet al., Science 263:802 (1994). GFP and mutants of GFP may be used asscreenable markers.

iv. Expression Vectors

Genes can be introduced in a site directed fashion using homologousrecombination. Homologous recombination permits site-specificmodifications in endogenous genes and thus inherited or acquiredmutations may be corrected, and/or novel alterations may be engineeredinto the genome. Homologous recombination and site-directed integrationin plants are discussed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,451,513;5,501,967 and 5,527,695.

The expression control elements used to regulate the expression of agiven protein can either be the expression control element that isnormally found associated with the coding sequence (homologousexpression element) or can be a heterologous expression control element.A variety of homologous and heterologous expression control elements areknown in the art and can readily be used to make expression units foruse in the present disclosure. Transcription initiation regions, forexample, can include any of the various opine initiation regions, suchas octopine, mannopine, nopaline and the like that are found in the Tiplasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Alternatively, plant viralpromoters can also be used, such as the cauliflower mosaic virus 19S andpromoters (CaMV 19S and CaMV 35S promoters, respectively) to controlgene expression in a plant (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,352,605; 5,530,196 and5,858,742 for example). Enhancer sequences derived from the CaMV canalso be utilized (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,164,316; 5,196,525; 5,322,938;5,352,605; 5,359,142; and 5,858,742 for example). Lastly, plantpromoters such as prolifera promoter, fruit specific promoters, Ap3promoter, heat shock promoters, seed specific promoters, etc. can alsobe used.

Either a gamete-specific promoter, a constitutive promoter (such as theCaMV or Nos promoter), an organ-specific promoter (such as the E8promoter from tomato), or an inducible promoter is typically ligated tothe protein or antisense encoding region using standard techniques knownin the art. The expression unit may be further optimized by employingsupplemental elements such as transcription terminators and/or enhancerelements.

Thus, for expression in plants, the expression units will typicallycontain, in addition to the protein sequence, a plant promoter region, atranscription initiation site and a transcription termination sequence.Unique restriction enzyme sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the expressionunit are typically included to allow for easy insertion into apre-existing vector.

In the construction of heterologous promoter/structural gene orantisense combinations, the promoter is preferably positioned about thesame distance from the heterologous transcription start site as it isfrom the transcription start site in its natural setting. As is known inthe art, however, some variation in this distance can be accommodatedwithout loss of promoter function.

In addition to a promoter sequence, the expression cassette can alsocontain a transcription termination region downstream of the structuralgene to provide for efficient termination. The termination region may beobtained from the same gene as the promoter sequence or may be obtainedfrom different genes. If the mRNA encoded by the structural gene is tobe efficiently processed, DNA sequences which direct polyadenylation ofthe RNA are also commonly added to the vector construct. Polyadenylationsequences include, but are not limited to the Agrobacterium octopinesynthase signal (Gielen et al., EMBO J 3:835-846 (1984)) or the nopalinesynthase signal (Depicker et al., Mol. and Appl. Genet. 1:561-573(1982)). The resulting expression unit is ligated into or otherwiseconstructed to be included in a vector that is appropriate for higherplant transformation. One or more expression units may be included inthe same vector. The vector will typically contain a selectable markergene expression unit by which transformed plant cells can be identifiedin culture. Usually, the marker gene will encode resistance to anantibiotic, such as G418, hygromycin, bleomycin, kanamycin, orgentamicin or to an herbicide, such as glyphosate (Round-Up) orglufosinate (BASTA) or atrazine. Replication sequences, of bacterial orviral origin, are generally also included to allow the vector to becloned in a bacterial or phage host; preferably a broad host range forprokaryotic origin of replication is included. A selectable marker forbacteria may also be included to allow selection of bacterial cellsbearing the desired construct. Suitable prokaryotic selectable markersinclude resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin, kanamycin ortetracycline. Other DNA sequences encoding additional functions may alsobe present in the vector, as is known in the art. For instance, in thecase of Agrobacterium transformations, T-DNA sequences will also beincluded for subsequent transfer to plant chromosomes.

To introduce a desired gene or set of genes by conventional methodsrequires a sexual cross between two lines, and then repeatedback-crossing between hybrid offspring and one of the parents until aplant with the desired characteristics is obtained. This process,however, is restricted to plants that can sexually hybridize, and genesin addition to the desired gene will be transferred.

Recombinant DNA techniques allow plant researchers to circumvent theselimitations by enabling plant geneticists to identify and clone specificgenes for desirable traits, such as improved fatty acid composition, andto introduce these genes into already useful varieties of plants. Oncethe foreign genes have been introduced into a plant, that plant can thenbe used in conventional plant breeding schemes (e.g., pedigree breeding,single-seed-descent breeding schemes, reciprocal recurrent selection) toproduce progeny which also contain the gene of interest.

v. Promoters

Genes included in expression vectors must be driven by nucleotidesequence comprising a regulatory element, for example, a promoter.Several types of promoters are now well known in the transformationarts, as are other regulatory elements that can be used alone or incombination with promoters.

As used herein, “promoter” includes reference to a region of DNAupstream from the start of transcription and involved in recognition andbinding of RNA polymerase and other proteins to initiate transcription.A “plant promoter” is a promoter capable of initiating transcription inplant cells. Examples of promoters under developmental control includepromoters that preferentially initiate transcription in certain organs,such as leaves, roots, seeds and tissues such as fibers, xylem vessels,tracheids, or sclerenchyma. Such promoters are referred to as“tissue-preferred”. Promoters which initiate transcription only incertain tissue are referred to as “tissue-specific”. A “cell type”specific promoter primarily drives expression in certain cell types inone or more organs, for example, vascular cells in roots or leaves. An“inducible” promoter is a promoter which is under environmental control.Examples of environmental conditions that may effect transcription byinducible promoters include anaerobic conditions or the presence oflight. Tissue-specific, tissue-preferred, cell type specific, andinducible promoters constitute the class of “non-constitutive”promoters. A “constitutive” promoter is a promoter which is active undermost environmental conditions.

A) Inducible Promoters

An inducible promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression insweet corn. Optionally, the inducible promoter is operably linked to anucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linkedto a gene for expression in sweet corn. With an inducible promoter therate of transcription increases in response to an inducing agent.

Any inducible promoter can be used in the instant disclosure. See Wardet al., Plant Mol. Biol. 22:361-366 (1993). Exemplary induciblepromoters include, but are not limited to, that from the ACEI systemwhich responds to copper (Mett et al., PNAS 90:4567-4571 (1993)); In2gene from maize which responds to benzenesulfonamide herbicide safeners(Gatz et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 243:32-38 (1994)) or Tet repressor fromTn10 (Gatz et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 227:229-237 (1991)). Aparticularly preferred inducible promoter is a promoter that responds toan inducing agent to which plants do not normally respond. An exemplaryinducible promoter is the inducible promoter from a steroid hormonegene, the transcriptional activity of which is induced by aglucocorticosteroid hormone (Schena et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 88:0421 (1991)).

B) Constitutive Promoters

A constitutive promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression insweet corn or the constitutive promoter is operably linked to anucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linkedto a gene for expression in sweet corn.

Many different constitutive promoters can be utilized in the instantdisclosure. Exemplary constitutive promoters include, but are notlimited to, the promoters from plant viruses such as the promoter fromCaMV (Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812 (1985)) and the promoters fromsuch genes as rice actin (McElroy et al., Plant Cell 2:163-171 (1990));ubiquitin (Christensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 12:619-632 (1989) andChristensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 18:675-689 (1992)); pEMU (Last etal., Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:581-588 (1991)); MAS (Velten et al., EMBO 13:2723-2730 (1984)) and maize H3 histone (Lepetit et al., Mol. Gen.Genetics 231:276-285 (1992) and Atanassova et al., Plant Journal 2 (3):291-300 (1992)). The ALS promoter, Xbal/Ncol fragment to the Brassicanapus ALS3 structural gene (or a nucleotide sequence similarity to saidXbal/Ncol fragment), represents a particularly useful constitutivepromoter. See PCT application WO96/30530.C.

C) Tissue-Specific or Tissue-Preferred Promoters

A tissue-specific promoter is operably linked to a gene for expressionin sweet corn. Optionally, the tissue-specific promoter is operablylinked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which isoperably linked to a gene for expression in sweet corn. Plantstransformed with a gene of interest operably linked to a tissue-specificpromoter produce the protein product of the transgene exclusively, orpreferentially, in a specific tissue.

Any tissue-specific or tissue-preferred promoter can be utilized in theinstant disclosure. Exemplary tissue-specific or tissue-preferredpromoters include, but are not limited to, a root-preferred promoter,such as that from the phaseolin gene (Murai et al., Science 23:476-482(1983) and Sengupta-Gopalan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.82:3320-3324 (1985)); a leaf-specific and light-induced promoter such asthat from cab or rubisco (Simpson et al., EMBO J. 4(11):2723-2729 (1985)and Timko et al., Nature 318:579-582 (1985)); an anther-specificpromoter such as that from LAT52 (Twell et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics217:240-245 (1989)); a pollen-specific promoter such as that from Zm13or a microspore-preferred promoter such as that from apg (Twell et al.,Sex. Plant Reprod. 6:217-224 (1993)).

Signal Sequences for Targeting Proteins to Subcellular Compartments

Transport of protein produced by transgenes to a subcellular compartmentsuch as the chloroplast, vacuole, peroxisome, glyoxysome, cell wall ormitochondrion or for secretion into the apoplast, is accomplished bymeans of operably linking the nucleotide sequence encoding a signalsequence to the 5′ and/or 3′ region of a gene encoding the protein ofinterest. Targeting sequences at the 5′ and/or 3′ end of the structuralgene may determine, during protein synthesis and processing, where theencoded protein is ultimately compartmentalized.

The presence of a signal sequence directs a polypeptide to either anintracellular organelle or subcellular compartment or for secretion tothe apoplast. Many signal sequences are known in the art. See, forexample Becker et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 20:49 (1992), Knox, C., et al.,Plant Mol. Biol. 9:3-17 (1987), Lerner et al., Plant Physiol. 91:124-129(1989), Fontes et al., Plant Cell 3:483-496 (1991), Matsuoka et al.,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:834 (1991), Gould et al., J. Cell. Biol.108:1657 (1989), Creissen et al., Plant 2:129 (1991), Kalderon, et al.,Cell 39:499-509 (1984), Stiefel, et al., Plant Cell 2:785-793 (1990).

Foreign Protein Genes and Agronomic Genes

With transgenic plants according to the present disclosure, a foreignprotein can be produced in commercial quantities. Thus, techniques forthe selection and propagation of transformed plants, which are wellunderstood in the art, yield a plurality of transgenic plants which areharvested in a conventional manner, and a foreign protein then can beextracted from a tissue of interest or from total biomass. Proteinextraction from plant biomass can be accomplished by known methods whichare discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr, Anal. Biochem. 114:92-6(1981).

According to a one embodiment, the transgenic plant provided forcommercial production of foreign protein is a sweet corn plant. Inanother preferred embodiment, the biomass of interest is seed or cob.For the relatively small number of transgenic plants that show higherlevels of expression, a genetic map can be generated, primarily viaconventional RFLP, PCR and SSR analysis, which identifies theapproximate chromosomal location of the integrated DNA molecule. Forexemplary methodologies in this regard, see Glick and Thompson, Methodsin Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick and Thompson Eds.,CRC Press, Boca Raton 269:284 (1993). Map information concerningchromosomal location is useful for proprietary protection of a subjecttransgenic plant. If unauthorized propagation is undertaken and crossesmade with other germplasm, the map of the integration region can becompared to similar maps for suspect plants, to determine if the latterhave a common parentage with the subject plant. Map comparisons wouldinvolve hybridizations, RFLP, PCR, SSR and sequencing, all of which areconventional techniques.

Likewise, by means of the present disclosure, agronomic genes can beexpressed in transformed plants. More particularly, plants can begenetically engineered to express various phenotypes of agronomicinterest. Exemplary genes implicated in this regard include, but are notlimited to, those categorized below:

Examples of Genes that Confer Resistance to Pests or Disease and thatEncode:

A. Plant disease resistance genes. Plant defenses are often activated byspecific interaction between the product of a disease resistance gene(R) in the plant and the product of a corresponding avirulence (Avr)gene in the pathogen. A plant variety can be transformed with one ormore cloned resistance gene to engineer plants that are resistant tospecific pathogen strains. See, for example Jones et al., Science266:789 (1994) (cloning of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance toCladosporium flavum); Martin et al., Science 262:1432 (1993) (tomato Ptogene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato encodes a proteinkinase); Mindrinos et al., Cell 78:1089 (1994) (Arabidopsis RSP2 genefor resistance to Pseudomonas syringae).

B. A Bacillus thuringiensis protein, a derivative thereof or a syntheticpolypeptide modeled thereon. See, for example, Geiser et al., Gene48:109 (1986), who disclose the cloning and nucleotide sequence of a Btalpha-endotoxin gene. Moreover, DNA molecules encoding alpha-endotoxingenes can be purchased from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas,Virginia, for example, under ATCC Accession Nos. 40098, 67136, 31995 and31998.

C. A lectin. See, for example, the disclosure by Van Damme et al., PlantMolec. Biol. 24:25 (1994), who disclose the nucleotide sequences ofseveral Clivia miniata mannose-binding lectin genes.

D. A vitamin-binding protein such as avidin. See PCT applicationUS93/06487. The application teaches the use of avidin and avidinhomologues as larvicides against insect pests.

E. An enzyme inhibitor, for example, a protease or proteinase inhibitoror an amylase inhibitor. See, for example, Abe et al., J. Biol. Chem.262:16793 (1987) (nucleotide sequence of rice cysteine proteinaseinhibitor), Huub et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:985 (1993) (nucleotidesequence of cDNA encoding tobacco proteinase inhibitor I), Sumitani etal., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57:1243 (1993) (nucleotide sequence ofStreptomyces nitrosporeus alpha-amylase inhibitor).

F. An insect-specific hormone or pheromone such as an ecdysteroid andjuvenile hormone, a variant thereof, a mimetic based thereon, or anantagonist or agonist thereof. See, for example, the disclosure byHammock et al., Nature 344:458 (1990), of baculovirus expression ofcloned juvenile hormone esterase, an inactivator of juvenile hormone.

G. An insect-specific peptide or neuropeptide which, upon expression,disrupts the physiology of the affected pest. Pratt et al., Biochem.Biophys. Res. Comm. 163:1243 (1989) (an allostatin is identified inDiploptera puntata). See also U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,317 to Tomalski etal., who disclose genes encoding insect-specific, paralytic neurotoxins.

H. An insect-specific venom produced in nature by a snake, a wasp, etc.For example, see Pang et al., Gene 116:165 (1992), for disclosure ofheterologous expression in plants of a gene coding for a scorpioninsectotoxic peptide.

I. An enzyme responsible for a hyper-accumulation of a monoterpene, asesquiterpene, a steroid, a hydroxamic acid, a phenylpropanoidderivative or another non-protein molecule with insecticidal activity.

J. An enzyme involved in the modification, including thepost-translational modification, of a biologically active molecule; forexample, a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic enzyme, a lipolytic enzyme,a nuclease, a cyclase, a transaminase, an esterase, a hydrolase, aphosphatase, a kinase, a phosphorylase, a polymerase, an elastase, achitinase and a glucanase, whether natural or synthetic. See PCTapplication WO 93/02197 in the name of Scott et al., which discloses thenucleotide sequence of a callase gene. DNA molecules which containchitinase-encoding sequences can be obtained, for example, from the ATCCunder Accession Nos. 39637 and 67152. See also Kramer et al., InsectBiochem. Molec. Biol. 23:691 (1993), who teach the nucleotide sequenceof a cDNA encoding tobacco hornworm chitinase, and Kawalleck et al.,Plant Molec. Biol. 21:673 (1993), who provide the nucleotide sequence ofthe parsley ubi4-2 polyubiquitin gene.

K. A molecule that stimulates signal transduction. For example, see thedisclosure by Botella et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24:757 (1994), ofnucleotide sequences for mung bean calmodulin cDNA clones, and Griess etal., Plant Physiol. 104:1467 (1994), who provide the nucleotide sequenceof a maize calmodulin cDNA clone.

L. A hydrophobic moment peptide. See PCT application WO95/16776(disclosure of peptide derivatives of Tachyplesin which inhibit fungalplant pathogens) and PCT application WO95/18855 (teaches syntheticantimicrobial peptides that confer disease resistance).

M. A membrane permease, a channel former or a channel blocker. Forexample, see the disclosure of Jaynes et al., Plant Sci. 89:43 (1993),of heterologous expression of a cecropin-beta, lytic peptide analog torender transgenic tobacco plants resistant to Pseudomonas solanacearum.

N. A viral-invasive protein or a complex toxin derived therefrom. Forexample, the accumulation of viral coat proteins in transformed plantcells imparts resistance to viral infection and/or disease developmenteffected by the virus from which the coat protein gene is derived, aswell as by related viruses. See Beachy et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.28:451 (1990). Coat protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upontransformed plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus,tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco etchvirus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus.

O. An insect-specific antibody or an immunotoxin derived therefrom.Thus, an antibody targeted to a critical metabolic function in theinsect gut would inactivate an affected enzyme, killing the insect.

P. A virus-specific antibody. See, for example, Tavladoraki et al.,Nature 366:469 (1993), who show that transgenic plants expressingrecombinant antibody genes are protected from virus attack.

Q. A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a pathogen ora parasite. Thus, fungal endo-alpha-1, 4-D-polygalacturonases facilitatefungal colonization and plant nutrient release by solubilizing plantcell wall homo-alpha-1, 4-D-galacturonase. See Lamb et al.,BioTechnology 10:1436 (1992). The cloning and characterization of a genewhich encodes a bean endopolygalacturonase-inhibiting protein isdescribed by Toubart et al., Plant 2:367 (1992).

R. A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a plant. Forexample, Logemann et al., BioTechnology 10:305 (1992), have shown thattransgenic plants expressing the barley ribosome-inactivating gene havean increased resistance to fungal disease.

Genes that Confer Resistance to an Herbicide, for Example:

A. An herbicide that inhibits the growing point or meristem, such as animidazolinone or a sulfonylurea. Exemplary genes in this category codefor mutant ALS and AHAS enzyme as described, for example, by Lee et al.,EMBO J. 7:1241 (1988), and Miki et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:449(1990), respectively.

B. Glyphosate (resistance conferred by mutant 5-enolpyruvlshikimate-3phosphate synthase (EPSP) and aroA genes, respectively) and otherphosphono compounds such as glufosinate (phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) and Streptomyces hygroscopicus PAT, bar, genes), andpyridinoxy or phenoxy propionic acids and cyclohexanediones (ACCaseinhibitor-encoding genes). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,835 toShah, et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a form of EPSPwhich can confer glyphosate resistance. A DNA molecule encoding a mutantaroA gene can be obtained under ATCC accession number 39256, and thenucleotide sequence of the mutant gene is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.4,769,061 to Comai. European patent application No. 0 333 033 to Kumadaet al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374 to Goodman et al., disclosenucleotide sequences of glutamine synthatase genes which conferresistance to herbicides such as L-phosphinothricin. The nucleotidesequence of a PAT gene is provided in European application No. 0 242 246to Leemans et al. DeGreef et al., BioTechnology 7:61 (1989), describethe production of transgenic plants that express chimeric bar genescoding for PAT activity. Exemplary of genes conferring resistance tophenoxy propionic acids and cyclohexanediones, such as sethoxydim andhaloxyfop are the Accl-S1, Accl-S2 and Accl-S3 genes described byMarshall et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:435 (1992).

C. An herbicide that inhibits photosynthesis, such as a triazine (psbAand gs+ genes) or a benzonitrile (nitrilase gene). Przibilla et al.,Plant Cell 3:169 (1991), describe the transformation of Chlamydomonaswith plasmids encoding mutant psbA genes. Nucleotide sequences fornitrilase genes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648 to Stalker, andDNA molecules containing these genes are available under ATCC AccessionNos. 53435, 67441, and 67442. Cloning and expression of DNA coding for aglutathione S-transferase is described by Hayes et al., Biochem. 1285:173 (1992).

Genes that Confer or Contribute to a Value-Added Trait, Such as:

A. Modified fatty acid metabolism, for example, by transforming a plantwith an antisense gene of stearyl-ACP desaturase to increase stearicacid content of the plant. See Knutzon et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 89:2624 (1992)

B. Increased resistance to high light stress such as photo-oxidativedamages, for example by transforming a plant with a gene coding for aprotein of the Early Light Induced Protein family (ELIP) as described inWO 03/074713 in the name of Biogemma.

C. Modified carbohydrate composition effected, for example, bytransforming plants with a gene coding for an enzyme that alters thebranching pattern of starch. See Shiroza et al., J. Bact. 170:810 (1988)(nucleotide sequence of Streptococcus mutants fructosyltransferasegene), Steinmetz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 20:220 (1985) (nucleotidesequence of Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene), Pen et al.,BioTechnology 10:292 (1992) (production of transgenic plants thatexpress Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase), Elliot et al., PlantMolec. Biol. 21:515 (1993) (nucleotide sequences of tomato invertasegenes), Sogaard et al., J. Biol. Chem. 268:22480 (1993) (site-directedmutagenesis of barley alpha-amylase gene), and Fisher et al., PlantPhysiol. 102:1045 (1993) (maize endosperm starch branching enzyme II).

D. Increased resistance/tolerance to water stress or drought, forexample, by transforming a plant to create a plant having a modifiedcontent in ABA-Water-Stress-Ripening-Induced proteins (ARS proteins) asdescribed in WO 01/83753 in the name of Biogemma, or by transforming aplant with a nucleotide sequence coding for a phosphoenolpyruvatecarboxylase as shown in WO 02/081714. The tolerance of corn to droughtcan also be increased by an overexpression of phosphoenolpyruvatecarboxylase (PEPC-C4), obtained, for example from sorghum.

E. Increased content of cysteine and glutathione, useful in theregulation of sulfur compounds and plant resistance against variousstresses such as drought, heat or cold, by transforming a plant with agene coding for an Adenosine 5′ Phosphosulfate as shown in WO 01/49855.

F. Increased nutritional quality, for example, by introducing a zeingene which genetic sequence has been modified so that its proteinsequence has an increase in lysine and proline. The increasednutritional quality can also be attained by introducing into the maizeplant an albumin 2S gene from sunflower that has been modified by theaddition of the KDEL peptide sequence to keep and accumulate the albuminprotein in the endoplasmic reticulum.

G. Decreased phytate content: 1) Introduction of a phytase-encoding genewould enhance breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to thetransformed plant. For example, see Van Hartingsveldt et al., Gene127:87 (1993), for a disclosure of the nucleotide sequence of anAspergillus niger phytase gene. 2) A gene could be introduced thatreduced phytate content. In maize, this, for example, could beaccomplished, by cloning and then reintroducing DNA associated with thesingle allele which is responsible for maize mutants characterized bylow levels of phytic acid. See Raboy et al., Maydica 35:383 (1990).

Tissue Culture

As it is well known in the art, tissue culture of sweet corn can be usedfor the in vitro regeneration of sweet corn plants. Tissues cultures ofvarious tissues of sweet corn and regeneration of plants therefrom arewell known and published. By way of example, a tissue culture comprisingorgans has been used to produce regenerated plants as described inGirish-Chandel et al., Advances in Plant Sciences. 2000, 13: 1, 11-17,Costa et al., Plant Cell Report. 2000, 19: 3327-332, Plastira et al.,Acta Horticulturae. 1997, 447, 231-234, Zagorska et al., Plant CellReport. 1998, 17: 12 968-973, Asahura et al., Breeding Science. 1995,45: 455-459, Chen et al., Breeding Science. 1994, 44: 3, 257-262, Patilet al., Plant and Tissue and Organ Culture. 1994, 36: 2, 255-258. It isclear from the literature that the state of the art is such that thesemethods of obtaining plants are routinely used and have a very high rateof success. Thus, another aspect of this disclosure is to provide cellswhich upon growth and differentiation produce sweet corn plants havingall the physiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid sweetcorn plant COACHMAN.

As used herein, the term “tissue culture” indicates a compositioncomprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or acollection of such cells organized into parts of a plant. Exemplarytypes of tissue cultures are protoplasts, calli, plant clumps, and plantcells that can generate tissue culture that are intact in plants orparts of plants, such as embryos, pollens, flowers, seeds, leaves,stems, roots, root tips, anthers, pistils, meristematic cells, axillarybuds, ovaries, seed coats, endosperms, hypocotyls, cotyledons and thelike. Means for preparing and maintaining plant tissue culture are wellknown in the art. By way of example, a tissue culture comprising organshas been used to produce regenerated plants. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,959,185,5,973,234, and describe certain techniques, the disclosures of which areincorporated herein by reference.

EXAMPLES

The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations relatedtherewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Otherlimitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill inthe art upon a reading of the specification.

Example 1—Development of New COACHMAN Sweet Corn Variety

Breeding History:

Sweet corn hybrid plant COACHMAN has superior characteristics. Thefemale (SWE3468) and male (SWE3853) parents were crossed to producehybrid (F1) seeds of COACHMAN. The seeds of COACHMAN can be grown toproduce hybrid plants and parts thereof. The hybrid COACHMAN can bepropagated by seeds produced from crossing corn inbred line SWE3468 withcorn inbred line SWE3853 or vegetatively.

The origin and breeding history of hybrid plant COACHMAN can besummarized as follows: the line SWE3468 (a proprietary line owned byHM.CLAUSE, Inc.) was used as the female plant and crossed by pollen fromSWE3853 (a proprietary line owned by HM.CLAUSE, Inc.). The first trialplanting of this hybrid was done in Stevens Point, WI, in the summer ofthe first year. The hybrid was further trialed for two more years, anexample of such trial being disclosed in Tables 2 and 3.

The inbred line SWE3468 is a yellow shrunken-2 inbred line used as thefemale parent in this cross. The inbred line SWE3468 has goodperformance in seed production and resistance to common rust, and toMaize dwarf mosaic virus.

The inbred line SWE3853 is a yellow shrunken-2 inbred line used as themale parent in this cross. The inbred line SWE3853 has resistance tocommon rust, maize dwarf mosaic virus, smut, and stalk rot, andtolerance to lodging.

Hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN is similar to hybrid sweet corn plantOverland, which is a commercial variety. As shown in Table 1, whilesimilar to hybrid sweet corn plant Overland, there are significantdifferences including: time of anthesis at 52 days after sowing, lengthof ear node leaf (34.35 inches), number of kernel rows (16.4), and brixmeasurement (13.22) for COACHMAN compared to time of anthesis at 55 daysafter sowing, length of ear node leaf (31.85 inches), number of kernelrows (18.4), and brix measurement (14.35) for Overland.

Some of the criteria used to select the hybrid COACHMAN and/or theirinbred parent lines in various generations include early vigor, strongplant type, resistance to common rust, maize dwarf mosaic virus, andnorthern leaf blight, tolerance to lodging, and recovery.

Hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN has shown uniformity and stability forthe traits, within the limits of environmental influence for the traitsas described in the following Variety Descriptive Information. Novariant traits have been observed or are expected for agronomicalimportant traits in sweet corn hybrid COACHMAN.

Hybrid sweet corn plant COACHMAN has the following morphologic and othercharacteristics, as compared to Overland (based primarily on datacollected in Wisconsin, all experiments done under the directsupervision of the applicant).

TABLE 1 TRAIT DESCRIPTION COACHMAN Overland Maturity in the Region ofBest Adaptability Ear: time of silk emergence (days; 50% of plants insilk) 55 56 Tassel: time of anthesis (days; 50% of plants have 52 55anthers in middle third of main branch) Plant Traits Stem: plant heightto tassel tip (inches); average 10 91.35 92.2 plants Stem: ear height tobase of top ear node (inches): 26.15 30.9 average 10 plants Stem: lengthof top ear internode (inches): average 10 7.05 3.85 plants Stem:anthocyanin of brace roots: absent, weak, absent absent medium, strong,very strong Leaf Traits Leaf: foliage intensity of green color; light,medium, medium medium dark leaf: number of leaves above top ear (average10 plants): 6.3 6 Leaf: width of ear node leaf (inches): average 10plants 3.2 7.23 Leaf: length of ear node leaf (inches): average 10plants 34.35 31.85 Leaf: angle between blade & stem (on leaf just abovesmall very large upper ear): 1 v small, 3 small +/= 25%, 5 med +/= 50%,7 large +/= 75%, 9 very large >= 90% Leaf: undulation of margin of blade(on leaf just above N/A very weak upper ear): absent, very weak, weak,intermediate, strong Leaf: curvature of blade (on leaf just above upperear): slightly recurved slightly recurved absent, slightly recurved,moderately recurved, strongly recurved, very strongly recurved Stem:sheath pubescence (in middle of plant): 1 = none 2 3 to 9 = like peachfuzz Stem: anthocyanin coloration of sheath (in middle of N/A absentplant): absent, weak, medium, strong, very strong Stem: anthocyanincoloration of internodes (in middle of absent absent plant): absent,weak, medium, strong, very strong Stem: degree of zig-zag: absent, veryslight, slight, slight strong medium, strong Tassel Traits Tassel:number of primary lateral branches on tassel (do 23.7 25.9 counts on 10plants): very few, few, medium, many, very many Tassel: top lateralbranch angle from central spike: small very large 1 very small, 3 small+/= 25*, 5 med +/= 50*, 7 large +/=75*, 9 very large >= 90* Tassel:angle between main axis and lateral branches medium very large (2ndlateral branch from bottom of tassel): 1 very small, 3 small +/= 25*, 5med +/= 50*, 7 large +/= 75*, 9 very large >= 90* Tassel: curvature oflateral branches (2nd lateral branch moderately slightly from bottom oftassel): absent, slightly recurved, recurved recurved moderatelyrecurved, strongly recurved, very strongly recurved Tassel: length of2nd lowest lateral branches (inches): 9.8 8.95 (average 10 plants) veryshort, short, medium, long, very long Tassel: length from top leafcollar to tassel tip (inches): 17.25 16 average 10 plants Tassel: lengthabove lowest lateral branch (inches): 25.7 14.15 average on 10 plantsTassel: length above highest lateral branch (inches): 9.4 9 average on10 plants Tassel: anther color: yellow, green, red, pink yellow yellowTassel: glume color: green, red green green Tassel: bar glumes (glumebands): absent, present absent absent Tassel: anthocyanin coloration atbase of glumes (middle absent absent third main branch): absent, veryweak, weak, medium, strong, very strong Tassel: anthocyanin colorationof glumes (middle third absent absent main branch) excluding base:absent, very weak, weak, medium, strong, very strong Tassel: anthocyanincoloration of anthers (middle third, N/A absent fresh anthers): absent,weak, medium, strong, very strong Ear: anthocyanin coloration of silk:absent, present absent absent Ear: intensity of anthocyanin colorationof silks: absent, absent absent weak, medium, strong, very strong EarTraits Ear: Silk color (3 days after emergence): yellow, green, yellowyellow pink, red Ear: (Unhusked) husk tightness (1 = very loose to 9 = 73 very tight) Ear: (Unhusked) husk extension (inches): average 10 0.280.23 ears Ear: (Husked) ear length (cm): average 10 ears 23.25 22.2 Ear:(Husked) ear diameter at mid-point (cm): average 10 5.1 5.23 ears Ear:(Husked) number of kernel rows: average 10 ears 16.4 18.4 Ear: (Husked)row alignment (scale: worst = 1, best = 9) 8 7 Ear: (Husked) shanklength: (inches) average 10 ears 1.58 1.73 (very short, short, medium,long, very long) Ear: (Husked) ear taper: conical, conical cylindrical,conical conical cylindrical cylindrical cylindrical Ear: (Husked) numberof kernel colors: one or two one one Ear: (Husked) intensity of yellowcolor: light, medium, medium medium dark Ear: (Husked) fresh kernelwidth (mm): average kernels 9.7 8.6 from 10 ears Ear: (Husked) freshkernel depth (mm): average kernels 12.2 12.6 from 10 ears Endospermtype: sh2 or su1 sh2 sh2 Eating Quality: Brix: average 10 ears 13.2214.35 Cob Traits Cob: diameter at mid-point (cm): average 10 ears 2.52.58 Cob: Cob color white white Disease Reaction Traits Common Rust(Puccinia sorghi) Highly Resistant Highly Resistant Maize Dwarf MosaicVirus (MDMV) Intermediate Intermediate Resistance Resistance NorthernCorn Leaf Blight (Exserohilum turcicum) Intermediate IntermediateResistance Resistance

In Table 2, the first column shows the variety name, the second column“Early Vigor” shows the overall rating of early vigor (1-worst to9-best). The third column “Ear Diameter” shows the measurement of eardiameter at midpoint in centimeters (cm). The fourth column “Ear Length”is the measurement of ear length in centimeters (cm). The fifth column“Tip Blank” is the measurement of the tip of the corn ear (incentimeters (cm)) that does not have kernels. The sixth column “HuskProtection” is the measurement in centimeters (cm) of the amount huskcover over the tip of the ear.

TABLE 2 Vigor and Ear Measurements from Early Sun Prairie, WI, Trial 1.Ear Ear Tip Husk Early Diameter Length Blank Protection Variety Vigor(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) COACHMAN 6.5 5.2 21.3 0.8 3.3 Overland 6.5 5.4 20.80.7 2.3

In Table 3, the first column shows the variety name, the second column“Early Vigor” shows the overall rating of early vigor (1-worst to9-best). The third column “Ear Diameter” shows the measurement of eardiameter at midpoint in centimeters (cm). The fourth column “Ear Length”is the measurement of ear length in centimeters (cm). The fifth column“Tip Blank” is the measurement of the tip of the corn ear (incentimeters (cm)) that does not have kernels. The sixth column “Days toMid-Silk” is the number of days from sowing when 50% of the plants hadsilk.

TABLE 3 Vigor and Ear Measurements from Steven's Point, WI, Trial 2. EarEar Tip Days to Early Diameter Length Blank Mid-Silk Variety Vigor (cm)(cm) (cm) (days) COACHMAN 6 5 21 2 62 Overland 6.5 5.1 21.5 0.8 66

DEPOSIT INFORMATION

A deposit of the sweet corn seed of this disclosure is maintained byHM.CLAUSE, Inc. Sun Prairie Research & Development, 1677 Muller Road,Sun Prairie, Wisconsin 53590, USA. In addition, a sample of the hybridsweet corn seed of this disclosure has been deposited with the NationalCollections of Industrial, Food and Marine Bacteria (NCIMB), NCIMB Ltd.Ferguson Building, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9YAScotland, United Kingdom.

To satisfy the enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, and to certifythat the deposit of the isolated strain of the present disclosure meetsthe criteria set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809, Applicants hereby make thefollowing statements regarding the deposited hybrid sweet corn COACHMAN(deposited as NCIMB Accession No. 44223 on Sep. 7, 2023).

1. During the pendency of this application, access to the disclosurewill be afforded to the Commissioner upon request;

2. All restrictions on availability to the public will be irrevocablyremoved upon granting of the patent under conditions specified in 37 CFR1.808;

3. The deposit will be maintained in a public repository for a period of30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the effective life ofthe patent, whichever is longer;

4. A test of the viability of the biological material at the time ofdeposit will be conducted by the public depository under 37 CFR 1.807;and

5. The deposit will be replaced if it should ever become unavailable.

Access to this deposit will be available during the pendency of thisapplication to persons determined by the Commissioner of Patents andTrademarks to be entitled thereto under 37 C.F.R. § 1.14 and 35 U.S.C. §122. Upon allowance of any claims in this application, all restrictionson the availability to the public of the variety will be irrevocablyremoved by affording access to a deposit of at least 625 seeds of thesame variety with the NCIMB.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All references, articles, publications, patents, patent publications,and patent applications cited herein are incorporated by reference intheir entireties for all purposes.

However, mention of any reference, article, publication, patent, patentpublication, and patent application cited herein is not, and should notbe taken as an acknowledgment or any form of suggestion that theyconstitute valid prior art or form part of the common general knowledgein any country in the world.

What is claimed is:
 1. A seed of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN,wherein a representative sample of seed of said hybrid has beendeposited under NCIMB No.
 44223. 2. A sweet corn plant, a part thereof,or a cell thereof, produced by growing the seed of claim 1, wherein thepart thereof comprises at least one cell of hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No.
 44223. 3. The sweet corn plant, thepart thereof, or the cell thereof of claim 2, wherein the part isselected from the group consisting of a leaf, a flower, an ear, a stalk,a root, a rootstock, a scion, an embryo, a peduncle, a stamen, ananther, a pistil, a pollen, an ovule, a meristem, and a cell.
 4. Atissue culture of regenerable cells produced from the sweet corn plantor the part thereof of claim
 2. 5. A sweet corn plant regenerated fromthe tissue culture of claim 4, wherein the plant regenerated from thetissue culture has all of the morphological and physiologicalcharacteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN.
 6. A sweetcorn ear produced from the plant of claim 2, wherein the ear has all ofthe morphological and physiological characteristics of the ear of hybridsweet corn designated COACHMAN.
 7. A method for harvesting a sweet cornear, the method comprising: (a) growing the sweet corn plant of claim 2to produce a sweet corn ear, and (b) harvesting said sweet corn ear. 8.A sweet corn ear produced by the method of claim 7, wherein the ear hasall of the morphological and physiological characteristics of the ear ofhybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN.
 9. A method for producing a sweetcorn seed, the method comprising: (a) crossing a first sweet corn plantwith a second sweet corn plant and (b) harvesting the resultant sweetcorn seed, wherein said first sweet corn plant and/or second sweet cornplant is the sweet corn plant of claim
 2. 10. A method for producing asweet corn seed, the method comprising: (a) self-pollinating the sweetcorn plant of claim 2 and (b) harvesting the resultant sweet corn seed.11. A method of vegetatively propagating the sweet corn plant of claim2, the method comprising: (a) collecting a part capable of beingpropagated from the plant of claim 2 and (b) regenerating a plant fromsaid part.
 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising (c) harvestingan ear from said regenerated plant.
 13. A plant obtained from the methodof claim 11, wherein said plant has all of the physiological andmorphological characteristics of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMANdeposited under NCIMB No.
 44223. 14. An ear obtained from the method ofclaim 12, wherein the ear has all of the morphological and physiologicalcharacteristics of the ear of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN. 15.A method of producing a sweet corn plant derived from hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN, the method comprising: (a) self-pollinating theplant of claim 2 at least once to produce a progeny sweet corn plantobtained from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN.
 16. The method ofclaim 15, further comprising the steps of: (b) crossing the progenyplant derived from the hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN with itselfor a second sweet corn plant to produce a seed of progeny plant ofsubsequent generation; (c) growing the progeny plant of the subsequentgeneration from the seed; (d) crossing the progeny plant of thesubsequent generation with itself or a second sweet corn plant toproduce a sweet corn plant derived from the hybrid sweet corn designatedCOACHMAN; and (e) repeating step (c) and/or (d) for at least onegeneration to produce a sweet corn plant derived from the hybrid sweetcorn designated COACHMAN.
 17. A method of producing a sweet corn plantderived from hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN, the methodcomprising: (a) crossing the plant of claim 2 with a second sweet cornplant to produce a progeny sweet corn plant obtained from hybrid sweetcorn designated COACHMAN.
 18. The method of claim 17, further comprisingthe steps of: (b) crossing the progeny plant derived from the hybridsweet corn plant designated COACHMAN with itself or a second sweet cornplant to produce a seed of progeny plant of subsequent generation; (c)growing the progeny plant of the subsequent generation from the seed;(d) crossing the progeny plant of the subsequent generation with itselfor a second sweet corn plant to produce a sweet corn plant derived fromthe sweet corn hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN; and (e)repeating step (c) and/or (d) to produce a sweet corn plant derived fromthe hybrid sweet corn plant designated COACHMAN.
 19. A method ofproducing a plant of hybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN comprising atleast one desired trait, the method comprising introducing a singlelocus conversion conferring the desired trait into hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No. 44223, whereby a plant ofhybrid sweet corn designated COACHMAN comprising the desired trait isproduced.
 20. A sweet corn plant or a cell thereof, produced by themethod of claim 19, wherein the plant comprises a single locusconversion and otherwise all of the characteristics of hybrid sweet corndesignated COACHMAN deposited under NCIMB No.
 44223. 21. The plant ofclaim 20, wherein the single locus conversion confers said plant withmale sterility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, diseaseresistance, water-stress tolerance, heat stress tolerance, increasedshelf life, increased sweetness and flavor, enhanced nutritionalquality, improved nutritional use efficiency, increased sugar content,delayed senescence or controlled ripening and/or improved salttolerance.
 22. The plant of claim 20, wherein the single locusconversion is an artificially mutated gene or nucleotide sequence. 23.The plant of claim 20, wherein the single locus conversion is introducedinto the plant by a genome editing technique with a nuclease selectedfrom the group consisting of Zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), TranscriptionActivation-Like Effector Nuclease (TALEN), Clustered RegularlyInterspaced Short Palindromic repeats-associated endonuclease Cas9(CRISPR-Cas9), engineered meganuclease, and engineered homingendonuclease.
 24. A method of producing a sweet corn plant, the methodcomprising grafting a rootstock or a scion of the hybrid sweet cornplant of claim 2 to another sweet corn plant.
 25. A method for producingnucleic acids, the method comprising isolating nucleic acids from theplant of claim 2, a part, or a cell thereof.
 26. A method for producinga second sweet corn plant, the method comprising applying plant breedingtechniques to the plant or part of claim 2 to produce the second sweetcorn plant.
 27. A method of producing a commodity plant product, themethod comprising obtaining the plant of claim 2 or a part thereof andproducing said commodity plant product therefrom.